The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.

E-cigarettes and the smoking ban

Discussion in 'Media and General News' started by sherid, Mar 15, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. sherid

    sherid Ultra Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    May 25, 2008
    E-cigarettes and the smoking ban
    Hug A Hoodie
    When the smoking ban came in, Lib Dems were split by the issue. You could legitimately use key liberal arguments on either side. I argued the point against Stephen Williams MP at a student meeting - I opposed the ban on the grounds of individual freedom to wreck your own lungs; he supported it on the basis that smoking in public caused unfair risk to others. We were both quoting Mill's famous harm principle on opposite sides of the same debate!

    The whole thing was confused even further by the legislation itself, which defined "public place" very widely, including privately-run businesses that were open to the public. That made it even harder to find the dividing-line between personal rights and public menace.

    The device that's now in the news is the e-cigarette, a fake cigarette which lets you inhale a fine mist of pure nicotine. Currently unregulated in the UK, various campaign groups (including ASH) are calling for selling restrictions similar to those in place for cigarettes.

    The key difference between an e-cigarette and the real thing is that the e-cigarette poses no risk to others in the vicinity. It doesn't pump smoke, tar, or carbon monoxide into the atmosphere. The only person who might be harmed is the person using it. On that basis, I'd argue that any regulation should be very light. Subject to the usual health and safety rules that you'd expect, there's no good reason for making it difficult to get hold of and "smoke" these devices.
    Posted by Jonny Wright at 13.3.09
    Labels: civil liberties, smoking ban

    Julian H said...

    Good to see you back, Guv.
    13 March 2009 12:30:00 GMT
    Jonny Wright said...

    Cheers mate! Been a while. Will keep it going from now on.
    13 March 2009 15:12:00 GMT
    Anonymous said...

    These devices certainly don't emit any second hand smoke. Even to the user himself the only active ingredient is the nicotine, which although a very addictive drug, is not in itself considered carcinogenic. Of course it's best for everyone to stop smoking completely without any replacement habit, but some people just can't do that. For those these things could be really helpful.
    Cannot Stop Smoking
    13 March 2009 18:14:00 GMT
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice