E-cigs "safer than smoking" challenged in court
- Thread starter caramel
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
What total BS!
I wonder, what remedies can Lorillard pursue against the plaintiffs?
I wonder, what remedies can Lorillard pursue against the plaintiffs?
Everything but the kitchen sink huh? I don't recall Blu ever saying "safe" possibly "safer than cigarettes" which is admittedly a fairly low bar. Don't they have to have some evidence of harm for cases like these? Maybe this will be a good thing, maybe a judge can take a look at the scientific evidence from all sides and make some sense of it. We can hope, right?
I can't believe they're back on the formaldehyde and antifreeze kick again. 
Hopefully something good comes out of this.
Hopefully something good comes out of this.So far legally it cannot be proven to be safer or more unsafe than smokiing. At least with US data. England and the EU have compiled more data by far than we have. We only compile data when there is profit to be made.
Propylene glycol is used as a safe antifreeze. Alcohol used to be used as antifreeze too.I can't believe they're back on the formaldehyde and antifreeze kick again.
Salt is used as antifreeze.
mmmmmm............I smell a rat here! Everything being used by Diek's attorney as evidence, seems to be generated by our old friends at the California Department of Public Health. I'd like to know who put this guy up to this,and who are the other plaintiff's. The guy has a 50 page complaint file!.......... maybe he just sat down and listed everything he saw on the CDPH ads!
From The Orange County Register Sept. 2, 2014
Orange County Superior Court judge censured for in-office sex - The Orange County Register
So, 4 of 33 California judges that have been disciplined by The California Commission on Judicial Performance in the last few years have been Orange County judges. From the article: "The commission has disciplined three other Orange County judges since 2012, including one who was removed from the bench. Statewide, the commission disciplined 30 judges in 2013, mostly with advisory letters."
Not that this has anything to do with the lawsuit, but it almost makes me think anything could happen, although it sure seems to me that Lorillard should be able to easily defend themselves from all that crap.
Orange County Superior Court judge censured for in-office sex - The Orange County Register
So, 4 of 33 California judges that have been disciplined by The California Commission on Judicial Performance in the last few years have been Orange County judges. From the article: "The commission has disciplined three other Orange County judges since 2012, including one who was removed from the bench. Statewide, the commission disciplined 30 judges in 2013, mostly with advisory letters."
Not that this has anything to do with the lawsuit, but it almost makes me think anything could happen, although it sure seems to me that Lorillard should be able to easily defend themselves from all that crap.
Orange County Superior Court judge censured for in-office sex - The Orange County Register
It's a good job it was only sex, can you imagine if they were caught smoking or using an E Cig in CA
It's a good job it was only sex, can you imagine if they were caught smoking or using an E Cig in CA
It's a good job it was only sex, can you imagine if they were caught smoking or using an E Cig in CA
God forbid they should be caught doing such a dastardly deed!!
Wouldn't it be funny if one of the judges pulled out an ecigar while sitting at the bench!
Orange County Superior Court judge censured for in-office sex - The Orange County Register
It's a good job it was only sex, can you imagine if they were caught smoking or using an E Cig in CA
lol
I honestly believe he might have been in even more trouble, yes even for vaping. Maybe even for using snus. I think you were being serious.
This could be very interesting! Wasn't it an affiliate of Lorillard that did the comparison of smoke, vapour and ambient air that showed the room with the vapour to have only 2 or 3 100,000ths of a microgram/square metre more "potentially harmful matter" than plain air? I'll see if I can dig up the link.
Here it is:
Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air
Here it is:
Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air
Last edited:
When you see studies like this (and I must have seen heaps), it makes one wonder how the ANTZ and letter brigade can keep on claiming that there is no research (apart from their own of course).
This is a great development IMO. BT can afford good lawyers, can hire good experts, who will expose the ANTZ lies in public.
But would that be to their advantage? Exposing the lies would show that the ANTZ have been lying about all of the systems from the beginning. They don't want that. BT wants to be the only delivery system left standing and they sure don't want to help further the cause for other manufacturers. Wouldn't it be better for them to just keep their mouths shut?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
