Ecigs not a tobacco product, juice is in the state of Missouri

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Mosh

Moved On
Jan 5, 2010
96
1
48
kansas city
So I've been entertaining the idea of opening up a vape shop in Kansas City. Today, a friend of mine asked if I would need a tobacco license to do it. I wasn't sure, so I looked it up.

There may be a gray area in terms of federal law, but Missourri law is very clear. If it has nicotine in it, doesn't even matter where the nicotine comes from, it's a tobacco product, and they tax it accordingly.

Found this on the web site:

Tobacco FAQ said:
What is considered other tobacco products?

Other tobacco products include: cigarette papers, clove cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, smoking tobacco, other forms of tobacco products, or products made with tobacco substitute containing nicotine.

Just to make sure, I called the department of revenue. Yep, they confirmed it. They said they've been getting a lot of E-cig inquiries lately. The jist was that the hardware is not taxed, unless it is bundled with cartridges or juice.

Thought I would share.
 

clyde2801

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 13, 2009
4,039
3,173
In the land of no hills and red dirt
Wow. I can't say I'm surprised, with all of the budget shortfalls and cash crunches experienced by state governments. Do they tax the big pharmaceutical companies who make and sell inhalers? Do pharmacies who sell nicotine inhalers need to be regulated and taxed?

Hopefully, nearby states won't adopt the same approach, and folks from the show me state can drive to say, Oklahoma to buy their e-cig supplies.

I remember pulling over in Joplin after getting off the turnpike to buy the cheaper cigarettes there...:rolleyes:
 

The Mosh

Moved On
Jan 5, 2010
96
1
48
kansas city
Wow. I can't say I'm surprised, with all of the budget shortfalls and cash crunches experienced by state governments. Do they tax the big pharmaceutical companies who make and sell inhalers? Do pharmacies who sell nicotine inhalers need to be regulated and taxed?

Hopefully, nearby states won't adopt the same approach, and folks from the show me state can drive to say, Oklahoma to buy their e-cig supplies.

I remember pulling over in Joplin after getting off the turnpike to buy the cheaper cigarettes there...:rolleyes:

I dunno Clyde. Seems like the right approach to me. Sure, 10% of wholesale invoice total for juice is a little steep, but at least they're being clear about it. Seems to me that the state is less likely to shut you down when they're taking your tax money.

Matter of fact, they said they do tax inhalers, patches, and gum. I was being snarky and made sure to ask. They said hat's where the substitute wording comes in. The way she explained it to me was that if a product is being sold for having nicotine value, they want a cut ranging between 10 and 16%.
 

Skully7780

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 14, 2010
316
1
45
hartford, ct
They raised the taxes on cigs here by $1 a couple of months ago. I called all my reps and actually was able to talk to one. I explained that I would do EVERYTHING it took to avoid the new tax and I have done so.

My friend at work ordered cigs online and at the end of the year realized she had to pay over $1000 in taxes for the year for cigs. I would hate to see the same sort of thing happen to customers. Or the opposite, if the states sued the company for not collecting the tax.
 

clyde2801

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 13, 2009
4,039
3,173
In the land of no hills and red dirt
As Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the greatest legal minds ever produced here in the good old USA, stated:

"The power to tax is the power to destroy."

If it's a sales tax, fine, good. If it's a special tax that they can alter at any time specifically for that product, then that's bad.

Does Missouri have a referendum process like Oklahoma does?
 

Skully7780

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 14, 2010
316
1
45
hartford, ct
Makes me wonder about other states. Could be part of the reason an njoy is 50 bucks at a truck stop. Personally MO having a policy to tax em makes me hopeful. I live just acrossed the border and since recieving revenue from them means they're less likely to ban em I think it may be a good thing.

Lol, is that time out in your avitar pic?
 

The Mosh

Moved On
Jan 5, 2010
96
1
48
kansas city
In general, I don't believe in taxes. I hate taxes. Despise the idea that somehow the government has earned the right to my hard earned money by the simple fact of its mere existence. I don't like the idea, and I don't approve of it. But regardless, taxes aren't going away. Maybe it's a question of which battles are the ones worth fighting? Is it more important to fight for fair taxation, or existence? I was thrilled when they told me they have no rule in place, or any plans at the present time to tax the hardware. Maybe it's a matter of perspective.
 

hazyrecollection

New Member
Dec 13, 2009
3
0
47
St Louis
As far as I'm concerned they can tax e-cigs and juice with my blessing. Ten to 16% is a small price to pay for not having to smoke analogs anymore.

They tax cigarettes to death and I was still happy to pay the 5+ dollars a day to smoke. If that's what it takes to keep them legal, go for it. I'll still be better off in the long run.

They can tax tomatoes, too. And lettuce while we're at it....then the FDA can keep themselves busy seizing shipments of THOSE at the border when they're out of season in the states.
 

Whitbit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2010
316
0
West Virginia
Actually hide n seek they're both hiding lol

Hopefully, when they get older, they'll get better at it. :lol:

This is a RIOT. :D ROFL

As far as I'm concerned they can tax e-cigs and juice with my blessing. Ten to 16% is a small price to pay for not having to smoke analogs anymore.

They tax cigarettes to death and I was still happy to pay the 5+ dollars a day to smoke. If that's what it takes to keep them legal, go for it. I'll still be better off in the long run.

They can tax tomatoes, too. And lettuce while we're at it....then the FDA can keep themselves busy seizing shipments of THOSE at the border when they're out of season in the states.


I LOVE this thread. I was just thinking the same thing after reading the OP. I could care less if they tax the juices, as they will be making money, and not worry about the money they are losing by losing cigarette smokers, because there wont be a loss. Of course the 0mg juices would remain tax-free :D

Go on, let um tax the crap. Less likely to have a ban.
 

SheerLuckHolmes

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,354
562
74
Tempe, Az
If only the government where just concerned with lost tobacco tax revenue. If that was true e-cigs and e-juice would already be taxed and this would all be over. It is BT and BP that are pushing the government to get rid of PVs because PVs are drastically cutting into their profits. Right now it is an irritation to BT & BP, but they see the writing on the wall and in a couple of years when there are more, way more, people enjoying PVs than analogs.... That is what they are afraind of and why all the BS in the US and in the UK.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread