Perhaps I simply don't understand how that feels, as I don't care how ignorant others are...
There's a very fine line between that and being a doormat.
Perhaps I simply don't understand how that feels, as I don't care how ignorant others are...
There's a very fine line between that and being a doormat.
I am the size of an American football player. The last time someone insulted or belittled me was in 8th grade...I also have a lot of patience for those I consider inferior...
Perhaps I simply don't understand how that feels, as I don't care how ignorant others are...
Normally I am right there with you on that. But since there are no min IQ requirements for voting or petitioning our elected officials , educating the masses is our best offense. Public opinion needs to be driven by facts not scare hype and myths.
I've checked and not found any PG.i might have missed something, but PG is an ingredient in asthma inhalers and hospital ventilation systems and likely in your father's COPD medicine. You just happen to vape it.
Best offense is a good defense. Then again, sometimes it's just better to avoid the whole debate with some knot heads. Since it doesn't seem likely you can avoid this individual, do your homework, memorize it and print out a reputable study to back you up. When you see him (her?) again say you looked up his claims and didn't find anything that would stand up in the scientific community to back him up. State the facts, hand him the study and stand back and watch his lips flap like a fish out of water.
I would furnish Mom with some links or printed information from CASAA. CASAA - The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives Association
She's concerned, nothing wrong with that. She needs factual information not erroneous "I heard" anecdotes.
I've checked and not found any PG.
I feel that the whole asthma inhalers claim is lacking, I have yet to find a concrete example.
What I mean is a picture of the actual inhaler with its list of indigents showing that it contains PG.
It's one thing to have the idea suggested on the internet, but it totally solidifies the claim to see an actual picture of it.
(...)
Just over a year ago I was an excited active member here. New to vaping, but loving it, loving this forum, became a supporting member.
Ran into problems. Decided to leave. Now I am back and see that not much has changed, but so much has changed LOL
You nailed it with 'technology in its infancy'
A year ago the common consensus on the forum was that vaping is completely safe. There is no such thing as second hand vapor. Being around someone who vapes does not expose you to anything. Basically it is perfectly clean and safe so I should be able to vape anywhere even in your face because it can't hurt anyone etc ad nauseum.
Fast forward. Now we know temps over 600 , well..not so safe. There can be some nasty byproducts. that yellow tar inside car windows has been replaced by a VG like goo. So many things we didn't know a year ago. Makes me wonder what we will know a year from now.
To allow the personal vaporizer (I hate the term e-cig) to make it's own history we have to start by admitting there is probably more we don't know compared to what we do.
Present our cause openly and honestly, outlying the benefits we know and the concerns we are unsure of with respect to others.
How can you intelligently educate non vapors when half the vaping community would argue that you are wrong no matter which side you argued?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I've checked and not found any PG.
I feel that the whole asthma inhalers claim is lacking, I have yet to find a concrete example.
What I mean is a picture of the actual inhaler with its list of indigents showing that it contains PG.
It's one thing to have the idea suggested on the internet, but it totally solidifies the claim to see an actual picture of it.
I agree about the homework and have considered making an actual binder of vape research.
Personally I feel though debates with some people will get nowhere, when they refute on the grounds that the research didn't come from a 'trusted source'(i.e a big medical journal).
When comes to this idea, I don't feel I should just go after her with a 'I read it on the internet so it must be true' type explanation. I just don't know how certain people would feel about reading information and a website that has a pro-vape leaning to big with.
@ thread in general
For now my little skirmish is behind me and I've calmed down and simply moved on.
The only thing that I would like to address is how I feel and why I feel vaping is doomed.
It goes into the idea of the drive-by media, they tell a story about the dangers of ecigs and never follow up. Like it were some form of subliminal messaging that no one would question. Once enough bad information got out about the device it would kill off its market, like fat clogging the arteries. The media would felt it was doing 'consumer justice' by raising a red flag over ecigs, meanwhile fail to mention any new advances, as an example a completely different atomizer with totally safe medical grade inhalants that do no change composition from heat.
I that a negative type of attack from the media wouldn't be just about being told to do so, but that they have moral obligation against anything that provides pleasure. That it is being done for an assumed common good rather than reason.
I saw you point this out in another thread. Got me curious. Funny thing is that us vapers perpetuating this "fact" makes it harder to dig up real information on it. Basic searches for PG and asthma inhalers yield page after page of results from vaping forums.
I've tried looking up individual inhalers, but can't find any definite proof. On the other hand it is an inactive ingredient and as such not required to be listed as an ingredient.
My conclusion so far is that it has been used, but I can't find any evidence of it still being used.
I'm with you on this one. I would really like to know for sure.
Looks like a good find. Will have to save the reading till I'm awake enough to interpret Greek againsee my above post.
regards
mike
Whatever I responded with, my wife's Doctor and my Doctor approve of the switch. My doctor even brought it up in relation to my labs/tests would be at the end.
I would help them take notice of quality ingredients (FDA -approved PG/VG/nicotine).
The problem that is taken advantage of is that their is no regulation for juices in having an FDA certification of quality. Some juice manufactures don't use USP-certified chemicals. China is really blatant about ignoring such standards.
In my thought, some of these issues will only get fixed by monitoring. I really look on juice vendor wed sites for those levels of quality. And I have contacted websites about not prominently seeing a listing. We can make our own progress, just be buying only quality made items.
I saw you point this out in another thread. Got me curious. Funny thing is that us vapers perpetuating this "fact" makes it harder to dig up real information on it. Basic searches for PG and asthma inhalers yield page after page of results from vaping forums.
I've tried looking up individual inhalers, but can't find any definite proof. On the other hand it is an inactive ingredient and as such not required to be listed as an ingredient.
My conclusion so far is that it has been used, but I can't find any evidence of it still being used.
I'm with you on this one. I would really like to know for sure.
To deliver a drug by nebulization, the drug must first be dispersed in a liquid (usually aqueous) medium. After application of a dispersing force (either a jet of gas or ultrasonic waves), the drug particles are contained within the aerosol droplets, which are then inhaled. Some drugs readily dissolve in water, whereas others need a cosolvent such as ethanol or propylene glycol.
Summary of Use Sites:
Indoor Non-Food:
Propylene glycol is used on the following use sites: air treatment (eating establishments, hospital, commercial, institutional, household, bathroom,transportational facilities); medical premises and equipment, commercial, institutional and industrial premises and equipment