Failure: dealing with the opposition.

Status
Not open for further replies.

VapinWolf

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 14, 2013
402
475
54
Grand Bay, Alabama USA
Perhaps I simply don't understand how that feels, as I don't care how ignorant others are...

Normally I am right there with you on that. But since there are no min IQ requirements for voting or petitioning our elected officials , educating the masses is our best offense. Public opinion needs to be driven by facts not scare hype and myths.
 
Last edited:

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Normally I am right there with you on that. But since there are no min IQ requirements for voting or petitioning our elected officials , educating the masses is our best offense. Public opinion needs to be driven by facts not scare hype and myths.

I'll leave that to the likes of BLU, njoy and VUSE with their television advertisements. Ignorant people respond well to commercials...
 

Zanderist

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2014
324
240
i might have missed something, but PG is an ingredient in asthma inhalers and hospital ventilation systems and likely in your father's COPD medicine. You just happen to vape it.
I've checked and not found any PG.

I feel that the whole asthma inhalers claim is lacking, I have yet to find a concrete example.
What I mean is a picture of the actual inhaler with its list of indigents showing that it contains PG.
It's one thing to have the idea suggested on the internet, but it totally solidifies the claim to see an actual picture of it.

Best offense is a good defense. Then again, sometimes it's just better to avoid the whole debate with some knot heads. Since it doesn't seem likely you can avoid this individual, do your homework, memorize it and print out a reputable study to back you up. When you see him (her?) again say you looked up his claims and didn't find anything that would stand up in the scientific community to back him up. State the facts, hand him the study and stand back and watch his lips flap like a fish out of water.

I agree about the homework and have considered making an actual binder of vape research.

Personally I feel though debates with some people will get nowhere, when they refute on the grounds that the research didn't come from a 'trusted source'(i.e a big medical journal).



I would furnish Mom with some links or printed information from CASAA. CASAA - The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives Association

She's concerned, nothing wrong with that. She needs factual information not erroneous "I heard" anecdotes.

When comes to this idea, I don't feel I should just go after her with a 'I read it on the internet so it must be true' type explanation. I just don't know how certain people would feel about reading information and a website that has a pro-vape leaning to big with.



@ thread in general

For now my little skirmish is behind me and I've calmed down and simply moved on.

The only thing that I would like to address is how I feel and why I feel vaping is doomed.

It goes into the idea of the drive-by media, they tell a story about the dangers of ecigs and never follow up. Like it were some form of subliminal messaging that no one would question. Once enough bad information got out about the device it would kill off its market, like fat clogging the arteries. The media would felt it was doing 'consumer justice' by raising a red flag over ecigs, meanwhile fail to mention any new advances, as an example a completely different atomizer with totally safe medical grade inhalants that do no change composition from heat.

I that a negative type of attack from the media wouldn't be just about being told to do so, but that they have moral obligation against anything that provides pleasure. That it is being done for an assumed common good rather than reason.
 

WattWick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2013
3,593
5,429
Cold Norway
I've checked and not found any PG.

I feel that the whole asthma inhalers claim is lacking, I have yet to find a concrete example.
What I mean is a picture of the actual inhaler with its list of indigents showing that it contains PG.
It's one thing to have the idea suggested on the internet, but it totally solidifies the claim to see an actual picture of it.

(...)

I saw you point this out in another thread. Got me curious. Funny thing is that us vapers perpetuating this "fact" makes it harder to dig up real information on it. Basic searches for PG and asthma inhalers yield page after page of results from vaping forums.

I've tried looking up individual inhalers, but can't find any definite proof. On the other hand it is an inactive ingredient and as such not required to be listed as an ingredient.

My conclusion so far is that it has been used, but I can't find any evidence of it still being used.

I'm with you on this one. I would really like to know for sure.
 

Frenchfry1942

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 12, 2014
7,459
14,397
Whatever I responded with, my wife's Doctor and my Doctor approve of the switch. My doctor even brought it up in relation to my labs/tests would be at the end.

I would help them take notice of quality ingredients (FDA -approved PG/VG/nicotine).

The problem that is taken advantage of is that their is no regulation for juices in having an FDA certification of quality. Some juice manufactures don't use USP-certified chemicals. China is really blatant about ignoring such standards.

In my thought, some of these issues will only get fixed by monitoring. I really look on juice vendor wed sites for those levels of quality. And I have contacted websites about not prominently seeing a listing. We can make our own progress, just be buying only quality made items.
 

Rizzyking

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 15, 2013
1,391
1,956
East Midlands, United Kingdom
I'm a happy vaper but with the new high wattage devices isn't there questions about what by products are produced and I'm sure I've seen formaldehyde mentioned. I vape at no more then 35 watts and usual wattage is between 20&25 same tanks same coils but one isn't happy at 20 and one is lol. I think there are aspects coming up now that haven't applied to mainstream vaping before. One thing is for damn sure vaping is healthier for me and those around me then tobacco ever was.
 

chargingcharlie

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 14, 2014
431
546
MA
Just over a year ago I was an excited active member here. New to vaping, but loving it, loving this forum, became a supporting member.
Ran into problems. Decided to leave. Now I am back and see that not much has changed, but so much has changed LOL

You nailed it with 'technology in its infancy'
A year ago the common consensus on the forum was that vaping is completely safe. There is no such thing as second hand vapor. Being around someone who vapes does not expose you to anything. Basically it is perfectly clean and safe so I should be able to vape anywhere even in your face because it can't hurt anyone etc ad nauseum.
Fast forward. Now we know temps over 600 , well..not so safe. There can be some nasty byproducts. that yellow tar inside car windows has been replaced by a VG like goo. So many things we didn't know a year ago. Makes me wonder what we will know a year from now.
To allow the personal vaporizer (I hate the term e-cig) to make it's own history we have to start by admitting there is probably more we don't know compared to what we do.
Present our cause openly and honestly, outlying the benefits we know and the concerns we are unsure of with respect to others.
How can you intelligently educate non vapors when half the vaping community would argue that you are wrong no matter which side you argued?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I agree with you completely. While I believe that vaping is an incredibly healthier alternative to smoking, there really just isn't enough data out there to know about any negative results from long term use. As with everything, moderation is key. People once believed smoking was safe and we think they were nuts for ever believing that. Who knows if our grandkids will feel the same about us? The one thing that I think a lot of people don't think about when they defend the safety of vaping is the fact that it's completely unregulated at this point and that comes with risk. While I'm against regulation and massive taxation of vaping products, it's going to wind up happening eventually. We all know that will cause the price to climb but it will also pave the way for more studies. IMO, unless we build our own hardware and coils, and we make our own juice, we really don't know what we are ingesting. Who knows if clones and cheaper Chinese hardware could very possibly have harmful metals in the coils that release particles in the vapor? Who really knows if a juice we bought online is as pure as they claim it is? At this time it's a risk I'm willing to take because, to be honest, I haven't smoked in 15 years and I don't drink. I often feel like a social outcast who is looked at as a boring "Mr Goody Two Shoes". I also have a dad who has really bad COPD. He is on O2 every day and can't climb into the seat of his truck without having to sit for a few minutes to catch his breath. Out of courtesy, I won't vape near him or my mother, and I probably won't even let them know I vape. My reason behind this isn't because I feel it's bad...it's more that I don't want them to worry about it and no amount of arguing or sending them pro-vaping articles would help that. When your dad was young (if he's as old as mine is), doctors were suggesting that pregnant women smoke to keep their weight gain low and to keep the babies weight down to provide a less stressful birthing. You telling them there's no harm means nothing because they were told that by their doctors 50 years ago about cigarettes. My dad has a horrible life right now and if refraining from vaping around him helps make his day even a fraction better then I'm all for it. My wife lost both of her parents 3 years ago. Her mom died from cancer at 60 and her dad died 4 months later (on her moms birthday) from a heart attack at age 63. Our lives have not been the same since, and I treasure every second I spend with my parents. IMO, even attempting to prove the safety of vaping to them just isn't worth it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
I've checked and not found any PG.

I feel that the whole asthma inhalers claim is lacking, I have yet to find a concrete example.
What I mean is a picture of the actual inhaler with its list of indigents showing that it contains PG.
It's one thing to have the idea suggested on the internet, but it totally solidifies the claim to see an actual picture of it.



I agree about the homework and have considered making an actual binder of vape research.

Personally I feel though debates with some people will get nowhere, when they refute on the grounds that the research didn't come from a 'trusted source'(i.e a big medical journal).





When comes to this idea, I don't feel I should just go after her with a 'I read it on the internet so it must be true' type explanation. I just don't know how certain people would feel about reading information and a website that has a pro-vape leaning to big with.



@ thread in general

For now my little skirmish is behind me and I've calmed down and simply moved on.

The only thing that I would like to address is how I feel and why I feel vaping is doomed.

It goes into the idea of the drive-by media, they tell a story about the dangers of ecigs and never follow up. Like it were some form of subliminal messaging that no one would question. Once enough bad information got out about the device it would kill off its market, like fat clogging the arteries. The media would felt it was doing 'consumer justice' by raising a red flag over ecigs, meanwhile fail to mention any new advances, as an example a completely different atomizer with totally safe medical grade inhalants that do no change composition from heat.

I that a negative type of attack from the media wouldn't be just about being told to do so, but that they have moral obligation against anything that provides pleasure. That it is being done for an assumed common good rather than reason.

listing of inactive ingredients is not required for inhalers.
see link below.
here's the relevant part.
" Current problems encountered with “inactive” ingredients include benzalkonium chloride-induced bronchospasm from antiasthmatic drugs, aspartame-induced headache and seizures, saccharin-induced cross-sensitivity reactions in children with sulfonamide allergy, benzyl alcohol toxicity in neonates receiving high-dose continuous infusion with preserved medications, dye-related cross-reactions in children with aspirin intolerance, lactose-induced ........, and propylene glycol-induced hyperosmolality and lactic acidosis. Although many other excipients have been implicated in causing adverse reactions, these are the most significant in the pediatric population."
link:“Inactive” Ingredients in Pharmaceutical Products: Update (Subject Review)
regards
mike
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
I saw you point this out in another thread. Got me curious. Funny thing is that us vapers perpetuating this "fact" makes it harder to dig up real information on it. Basic searches for PG and asthma inhalers yield page after page of results from vaping forums.

I've tried looking up individual inhalers, but can't find any definite proof. On the other hand it is an inactive ingredient and as such not required to be listed as an ingredient.

My conclusion so far is that it has been used, but I can't find any evidence of it still being used.

I'm with you on this one. I would really like to know for sure.

see my above post.
regards
mike
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
Whatever I responded with, my wife's Doctor and my Doctor approve of the switch. My doctor even brought it up in relation to my labs/tests would be at the end.

I would help them take notice of quality ingredients (FDA -approved PG/VG/nicotine).

The problem that is taken advantage of is that their is no regulation for juices in having an FDA certification of quality. Some juice manufactures don't use USP-certified chemicals. China is really blatant about ignoring such standards.

In my thought, some of these issues will only get fixed by monitoring. I really look on juice vendor wed sites for those levels of quality. And I have contacted websites about not prominently seeing a listing. We can make our own progress, just be buying only quality made items.

i would like to know who is not using ingredients that are not GRAS.
it seems to me they would have to go out of there way to find suppliers
of non GRAS ingredients.
concerning China there have been instances of less than quality products.
you would be hard pressed now to find that to be the case.
Dekang,Fastech,and Ali Baba all have pretty good quality control.
they know Americans and Westerners in general demand better
quality than they can sluff off on the Asian markets.
:2c:
regards
mike
 

WhiteHighlights

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2013
1,659
10,348
MetroWest Boston, MA, USA
I saw you point this out in another thread. Got me curious. Funny thing is that us vapers perpetuating this "fact" makes it harder to dig up real information on it. Basic searches for PG and asthma inhalers yield page after page of results from vaping forums.

I've tried looking up individual inhalers, but can't find any definite proof. On the other hand it is an inactive ingredient and as such not required to be listed as an ingredient.

My conclusion so far is that it has been used, but I can't find any evidence of it still being used.

I'm with you on this one. I would really like to know for sure.

I had a little time so I checked my inhalers and didn't see PG listed as an inactive ingredient but ethanol was. I did some searches (try nebulizers) and found this from 2002. Although I didn't/couldn't get to the full study, the summary implies PG was in use/an option at the time: Formulations and nebulizer performance. - PubMed - NCBI

To deliver a drug by nebulization, the drug must first be dispersed in a liquid (usually aqueous) medium. After application of a dispersing force (either a jet of gas or ultrasonic waves), the drug particles are contained within the aerosol droplets, which are then inhaled. Some drugs readily dissolve in water, whereas others need a cosolvent such as ethanol or propylene glycol.


I also found this from 2006. People mention it being used in hospitals for it's antibacterial properties. This is an EPA Registration for Eligibility Decision: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/reregistration/REDs/propylene_glycol_red.pdf
Summary of Use Sites:
Indoor Non-Food:
Propylene glycol is used on the following use sites: air treatment (eating establishments, hospital, commercial, institutional, household, bathroom,transportational facilities); medical premises and equipment, commercial, institutional and industrial premises and equipment

I may do more searching later just because I'm curious, but I'm running behind on my Sunday to-do's! Oops!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread