GGTS Platinum final

[imeothanasis]

I did like the original idea of the whole unit that goes together in one piece for transport, but I can see why simplifying it a bit might make sense - specially if people weren't really going to need that feature much.

yes Lisa, I dont think that anyone will use it in all its length, its really huge.

So we can avoid extra cost for it and we will have all the other features as they are now. I dont see any other change and I dont want to make any. GGTS must stay the ultimate cig with all its features exept this one that is useless. I did it only because I could do it but no reason for it as I see it.

 

[Lisaf01]

See if anyone else says that they really want this feature or not before completely dismissing it - I am not the authority on e-cigs.

 

[abhowe]

My other E-Cigs are already just collecting dust..... I only use my GG Transformer...... When you have the best, what do you do with the rest......

 

[imeothanasis]

My other E-Cigs are already just collecting dust..... I only use my GG Transformer...... When you have the best, what do you do with the rest......

Ab, nice poet, I like it!!!

 

[Di]

No No No

my slogan for the GG has always been -----

you've tried the rest --

now buy the best ----- GG

 

[imeothanasis]

No No No

my slogan for the GG has always been -----

you've tried the rest --

now buy the best ----- GG

xaxa a nice slogan too Di

 

[vapn]

I cannot see the video...

Nevermind Youtube is down at the moment.

 

[Stormynights]

I liked the idea of having it all together. I think that is an awesome feature. It will be handy for the ones that have more than one GG. I am not looking at the difficulty of this feature only the convenience. I will buy one either way.

 

[imeothanasis]

I liked the idea of having it all together. I think that is an awesome feature. It will be handy for the ones that have more than one GG. I am not looking at the difficulty of this feature only the convenience. I will buy one either way.

Ok, I will do it, I thought again. The only think that we will not be able to do is to put caps on GGTS with all the other parts because I dont like who it looks. I mean that we will have on GGTS the 2 caps for 901 and 801 and all the other parts, but in small size we will put them out. Better?

 

[vapn]

I like the new AFS on this. Don't think I personally would use the USB.. I have the PS USB sitting here and hardly use it anymore. It does come in handy if I want something just a little more than 3.7 but less than 6v though. So this could be a good thing for the GG... As long as I could take that part off and put a nice gold cap in it's place for public use.

Plus I don't know if I like the threads going all the way on the telescopic part. I know why you did this so it can lock in place. But it is not a problem with mine. I notice you are not using the locking ring on yours either.

So my vote is yes to a USB option. Maybe sell it as an extra add on kit... But would have to be ordered with the original GG so threads would be the same and fit good?

 

[imeothanasis]

I like the new AFS on this. Don't think I personally would use the USB.. I have the PS USB sitting here and hardly use it anymore. It does come in handy if I want something just a little more than 3.7 but less than 6v though. So this could be a good thing for the GG... As long as I could take that part off and put a nice gold cap in it's place for public use.

Plus I don't know if I like the threads going all the way on the telescopic part. I know why you did this so it can lock in place. But it is not a problem with mine. I notice you are not using the locking ring on yours either.

So my vote is yes to a USB option. Maybe sell it as an extra add on kit... But would have to be ordered with the original GG so threads would be the same and fit good?

vapn, I found a way to make threads to fit in all GGTS so anyone can order later!! I wanted to do this because I dont want to make my people buy unesesary things.

As for the all threaded telescopic tube, sometimes I do things just to proove to anyone that I can do it, nothing else. The reality is that these threads are uesesary because you saw it by your own that its useless and I dont use it either.
BUT......
if we want to use AFS with hole down and button up, we need all the threads because we will screw AFS AS WE WANT!!
So the desision now is: threaded telescope and no ability for putting AFS as we want or a GGTS without threads and button in another place everytime?

 

[Lisaf01]

BUT......
if we want to use AFS with hole down and button up, we need all the threads because we will screw AFS AS WE WANT!!
So the desision now is: threaded telescope and no ability for putting AFS as we want or a GGTS without threads and button in another place everytime?

Oh dear, this is going to be a very hard decision - you know I was never that keen on the exposed threads - but they do perform a very useful function in the AFS scenario, cos I do like to have my button facing upwards.
Don't know how you're going to decide on this one.

 

[imeothanasis]

I have already took my desision sweety, I want to know yours now and the opinion of all my people here.

 

[Lisaf01]

I have already took my desision sweety, I want to know yours now and the opinion of all my people here.

My decision is, I don't know - you make it, I'll buy it.

 

[vapn]

I see perfectly now how those threads could come in handy to position the hole how you want it. But would you still need to do the battery spacers inside for the battery to make contact. OOOO you use a spring inside for the battery? I am sure whatever you come up with is there for a reason. And I know I will have to have one because I know it will work so well.

 

[imeothanasis]

I see perfectly now how those threads could come in handy to position the hole how you want it. But would you still need to do the battery spacers inside for the battery to make contact. OOOO you use a spring inside for the battery? I am sure whatever you come up with is there for a reason. And I know I will have to have one because I know it will work so well.

xaxa exactly vapn, I will put a spring inside so it will make a contact even if we dont screw GG totally. We can stop it by the ring of telescope whereever we want

 

[Obie]

I must admit that I prefer the look of the original prototype GGTS without the exposed threads

 

[imeothanasis]

Ok Obie!

Anyone else with a suggestion?

 

[Stormynights]

You are the engineer. You have to decide what will work best. We want it all but you have decide what is best for the best GG.

 

[imeothanasis]

Ok stormy, you know that I want to satisfy all people, so my desision is that I will make one threaded and one unthreaded telescope system