I also noticed that someone put their pack of cigarettes at $1,000.00, which super-inflates the estimated value. I'm guessing this was a simple mistake of a missing decimal for in entry of $10, but if these numbers were to be used for any serious purpose, that sort of mistake would decrease its credibility and validity. (I don't imagine that such an informal tool would be included in actual research, but it weakens even casual arguments in favor of vaping vs. tobacco by being blatantly incorrect.)
(I apologize for being too lazy to read through the entire 14 pages to see if the last bit has been addressed already. 14 pages of "I added my info" is just a bit much
Yeah, I monitor the results and remove anything that looks out of the ordinary.