has anyone tryed the new johnson creek smoke juice

Status
Not open for further replies.

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
I've been testing it since Sunday morning, and so far so good. No decline in vapor production or ease of draw. I am noticing the cartridge doesn't pass the liquid very well, and I keep having to top off, but I'm not totally sure if that's the JC or just the cartridges. I'll be producing a video after 7 days.
 

mEtoke2

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 4, 2008
257
4
Wisconsin, USA
leaford said:
I am noticing the cartridge doesn't pass the liquid very well, and I keep having to top off, but I'm not totally sure if that's the JC or just the cartridges.

I also have that problem with JC's. Wether I'm using a penstyle or a 901. I feel that the fluid is to thin. With more viscosity I think it would draw out of the cart better due to the tackyness of the fluid. If I lay my smoker down for a while with a cart of JC's in it the fluid starts to leak out, but with a thicker fluid like Janty's, this does'nt happen. This viscosity thing the only thing I wish would be changed with JC. I think Christians new recipe IS atomizer freindly now and you can't beat the taste.
 

Kimmiegrif

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 21, 2008
609
14
Maryland USA
I have been sampling JC juice for a week. I am a newbie but so far so good. I did have one janty classic battery bite the dust but I don't think it was because it was defective. It didn't hold a charge like the other one does.

The JC juice does seem a bit thinner than other brands I have tried, but there are a few that I really like the flavors...chocolate, vanilla ice cream and peach cobbler I have come to really like. I ordered the chocolate and received it today. I haven't tried it but it looks clear. I haven't tried the non PG. I would love to hear what people have to say about the non PG.

I don't drip as much or top off a cart with as much as I would with the thicker juices. The advertising they sent with it does say "new formula" or something like that, so I guess they do admit the last formula had probs. I never tried the "old formula"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread