HEADS UP - NEWS - UPDATES! (When we know, you'll know!)

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
CASAA THR NEWS
Politicians scaremongering over “school supply” vapes. Smoking rates are still low despite the rise in vaping. “Stop & Swap” program in UK helps nurse switch to vaping. Supreme Court mulling FDA lawsuit and more!

Catch Up Now: https://casaa.org/vaping-product-bi...theater-and-more-tobacco-harm-reduction-news/

CASAA Vapes Look Like School Supplies.png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
As drafted, State Senator Joe Gruters’ (R - District 22) bill would prohibit smoking of any kind (and vaping) in all areas open to the public, including streets, sidewalks and parks.

“I’m not a big fan of smoking of any kind anywhere,” he said. “I think it infringes on my quiet enjoyment of when I’m out in the public.”

He knows that there's no evidence of health risks from tobacco smoke outside (and definitely no evidence of risk from vapor,) so it's all about his own "quiet enjoyment." But other things can impact "quiet enjoyment" in public, too. What about heavy perfume? Body odor? Cooking smells? Vehicle exhaust?

Clearly this is not just about disliking things that smell. It's more likely about disliking people who smoke and vape.

At this rate, with more and more rules and laws banning indoor smoking and vaping in private residences such as rentals, condos and assisted living units, pretty soon adults who smoke or vape won't have ANY place that they can have quiet enjoyment of their preferred product.

Funny how, decades ago, they told us that claims of a "slippery slope" to a full ban of smoking was "just a conspiracy theory."


Screenshot (1121).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
We've seen a lot of bad videos about #vaping and #nicotine, but this one from Michael Fiorelli of Adagio Health in Pennsylvania is particularly bad -- full of misinformation and even outright lies from beginning to end, including:

"You've got issues with oral cancers and throat cancers" with vaping;
"Diacetyl...causes what's called EVALI;"
"We see people who are developing what's called popcorn lung" (ironic that he says earlier that diacetyl causes EVALI,)
and that lung transplants are "coming about more and more as time goes on with vaping."

While videos such as these are unlikely to keep youth from trying vaping, they can be quite effective in scaring at-risk adults who smoke away from switching to far safer alternatives. Nice going, @AdagioHealth.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"These results are particularly relevant as Maryland lawmakers have recently considered banning the sale of flavored tobacco and vapor products. While such measures aim to prevent youth access to age-restricted products, they may also inadvertently restrict adult access to safer alternatives to smoking."
~Lindsey Stroud (@lmstroud89)


Screenshot (1123).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
“The original gateway hypothesis, [Dr. Arielle Selya] noted, described use of legal substances (like tobacco and alcohol) leading to illicit substances, often starting with cannabis and then progressing to “harder” drugs. Concerns about cannabis being a “gateway drug” influenced marijuana policy for decades.

That original gateway hypothesis has been “debunked,” Dr. Selya pointed out, but the version applied to vapes is very much alive—despite exhibiting similar flaws.”

~ Kiran Sidhu, Filter Magazine


Screenshot (1124).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
This article claims #vaping has "become a big problem in Wyoming" and has a video filled with unverified, misleading and false claims. But is there evidence to support the claim that vaping has recently become a "big problem" in Wyoming?

The reporter uses the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK) as their source. However, the high school vaping rate shown on the CTFK Wyoming page is data from nearly a decade ago, because Wyoming hasn't participated in the CDC Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System (YRBSS) since 2015. See: https://wysac.uwyo.edu/wyomingtobacco/2019/09/20/youth-tobacco-use/

Additionally, that 29.6% of "current users" mentioned in the article is actually counting youth who vaped "even one puff in the past 30 days." In 2015, youth curiosity of vaping was growing fast because it was something new. Most teens may have just happened to have tried it once or twice in the month before the survey. This is supported by the fact that the "frequent use" rate (vaped on 20 or more days in the past month) was just 5.1% and the "daily" rate was just 3.4%.

In 2015, the YRBSS reported that the national "past 30 day" high school vaping rate was 24.1%, which dropped to 18% in 2021 (the most recent year available on the CDC website.) The 2015 National Youth Tobacco Survey found that 16% of high school youth had tried vaping in the past 30 days. In 2023 that had dropped to 10%.

According to the above linked article:
"Between 2001 and 2015, the smoking rates for Wyoming and U.S. students declined. The trend among Wyoming high school students is similar to the national trend."

With Wyoming following the national tobacco/nicotine use trends in the past, it's not unreasonable to surmise that the Wyoming vaping rates have declined similarly to the national rate.

And let's not forget that -- despite the claim made in the video that "vaping makes it much more likely that kids will smoke real cigarettes later" -- the surveys show that, as vaping has risen, youth smoking has declined. In 2015, the national high school cigarette smoking rate was 9.3% and that dropped to 1.6% by 2023 (NYTS). The YRBSS also shows a decline, from 10.8% in 2015 to 3.8% in 2021.


Screenshot (1125).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
The Aitkin County Board (MN) unanimously passed an amended tobacco ordinance at its Aug. 13 meeting without the proposed prohibition of selling any flavored tobacco or vaping products.

After learning that some businesses selling the products did not receive a letter of notification and discovering the financial impact on many businesses, the ban was removed from the amended ordinance.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
It's refreshing to read a mainstream media article about EVALI that tells the truth about vitamin E acetate in (mostly illicit) cannabis vapes and doesn't still try to implicate nicotine vaping products. Kudos to the writer, Emily Earlenbaugh!

This is a good one to share with people who are still pushing that false narrative.


Screenshot (1127).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"I had the impression that my whole world was crumbling. I tried desperately to reject this new evidence. But then he did what all good scientists should do: he set aside his bruised ego (presumably after polishing off that drink) and got back to work."

Tobacco Control scientists and researchers should take heed of this advice when it comes to their knee-jerk resistance to tobacco harm reduction.


Screenshot (1128).png
 

WorksForMe

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 21, 2012
2,020
4,776
N.N., Virginia
Tobacco Control scientists and researchers should take heed of this advice when it comes to their knee-jerk resistance to tobacco harm reduction.
Unfortunately, most Tobacco Control "scientists" are paid to start with a predetermined conclusion and then look for evidence to prove it.

.
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
The lies about "health risks" used to support indoor #vaping bans -- and the bans themselves -- discourage adults who smoke from switching to these far safer alternatives. How is people continuing to smoke better for public health?

This proposed indoor (and outdoor) ban in San Antonio is pulling out all of the classics from the misinformation bag.

The City Council’s Community Health Committee voted on August 19th to bring the proposed ban to the full council next month.

Members of the committee "needed zero convincing" after Claude Jacob, health director for the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District, apparently misled them by stating that "the concentration of toxicants in these aerosols poses an increased risk to the health of bystanders."

In truth, there's no convincing evidence that exhaled vapor poses a reasonable risk to bystanders.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
What articles like these don't seem to want the public to know is how past-30-day high school smoking in West Virginia had dramatically and unexpectedly dropped 12 percentage points from 19.6% in 2013 to 7.6% in 2021 (YRBSS). Compare that to the previous 8 year time period when smoking dropped by only 5.7 points from 25.3% in 2005 to 19.6% in 2013.

Daily smoking (thought by many experts to be a better indication of actual dependency) dropped from 6.7% to 1.2% between 2013 and 2021. Past-30-day #vaping has also declined from 31.2% in 2015 to 27.5% in 2021.

Nationally, past-30-day high school smoking has dropped from 18.1% in 2011 to 3.8% in 2021 and vaping has declined from 24.1% in 2015 to 18% in 2021(YRBSS).

If the CDC believes there is "the urgent need for more effort to reduce smoking, especially in adolescents," then maybe the fact that "teenagers are adopting vaping without prior cigarette smoking experience" should be good news rather than "troubling?" Of course, no one wants teens to use any kind of drug or alcohol, but the evidence so far suggests that those teens who otherwise would be starting smoking today are at least choosing low risk vaping instead – and not going on to smoke cigarettes.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
We often see the claim that young people moving to tobacco harm reduction products, such as #vaping and nicotine pouches, "threatens to undo years of public health efforts that had led to a decline in nicotine use" and are "creating a new generation addicted to nicotine."

This graph is a representation of the trends in past 30 day use for high school youth and young adults 18 - 24 years old (ie. the "new generation.") The 2021 cigarette smoking and nicotine vaping groups combined aren't even as high as just cigarette smoking was in 2002 – and high school vaping declined even more in 2023. It's quite clear that far fewer young people are using nicotine products than ever before.

THR products are "creating a new generation addicted to nicotine?" Their math just isn't mathing, folks.

CASAA A New Generation of Nicotine Addicts High School and Adult 18-24.jpg
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
This study "focuses on young adults who only vape nicotine and whether exposure to new and emerging nicotine and cannabis products, such as those with new flavors or product designs, leads to other tobacco or cannabis product use." It sounds as though it will essentially be a "gateway theory" study, which could be interesting...if done without bias.

We look forward to seeing if researchers look for answers to deeper questions regarding use beyond advertising, flavors and designs, such as:

Do/did your parents, siblings or friends smoke or use other tobacco products?

Do you have any mental health conditions, whether professionally or self-diagnosed, such as depression, anxiety, ADHD, autism, etc.?

Do you take medication for a mental health condition or do you use nicotine/cannabis to "self medicate?"

Do you identify as a member of the LGBTQ+ community?

Do you believe you would have likely smoked cigarettes if vapor products had never been available?

In order to support the gateway theory, researchers must consider and exclude "common liability" as a possibility. Otherwise, deterring young adults from vaping may just lead to more of them smoking instead.


READ MORE: New Study Targets Marketing of Vaping Products, Influence on Young Adults

Screenshot (1159).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
The Kentucky factory that manufactures Zyn is expanding to help meet demand for the safer, smoke-free alternatives to smoking.

“We are accelerating our mission toward a smoke-free future, working with our U.S. affiliates to move adults away from cigarettes and other traditional tobacco products by providing better alternatives,” said Stacey Kennedy, CEO of PMI’s U.S. business.

READ MORE: https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...d0573e-648d-11ef-a399-4245aabdb0ed_story.html
Screenshot (1160).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
We recently posted about claims that "vaping threatens to undo years of work by public health" and this article is a perfect example.

As we showed with the chart in that previous post, there's no evidence to support that claim, but in this Lund Report article, the American Lung Association uses misdirection, a sly use of the common understanding of certain definitions and the purposeful omission of facts in an attempt to convince an unwitting public that youth vaping is an "epidemic."

We're going to break it down so you can learn to spot this type of obfuscation for yourself in the future!

"New research found that teenage vaping threatens to undo years of work by public health officials to cut down on tobacco use."

This statement omits any evidence to back it up. (Note how vaping is called "tobacco use" here. That will come up later.) As our previous post pointed out, not only has smoking declined dramatically for teens and young adults over the past 20 years, but the decline was greater in the past 10 years than it was in the previous decade.

"The National Youth Tobacco survey of more than 22,000 students nationwide in 2023 found that 10% of U.S. secondary students vape nicotine, which is more than those who use all other tobacco combined."

CASAA A New Generation of Nicotine Addicts High School and Adult 18-24.jpg


This is a sly use of what the public would understand as "tobacco." Remember how they called vaping "tobacco use" earlier?

Yes, 1.56 million high school youth reported current vaping (remember, that means "even one puff in the past 30 days") vs. the 1.21 million who used other "tobacco." However, if you include nicotine pouches and "other" oral nicotine products (regulated as "tobacco products" by the FDA,) that number rises to 1.65 million using tobacco and nicotine products other than e-cigarettes.

Funny how certain nicotine products are only referred to as "tobacco" when it fits the narrative.

Screenshot (1162).png



The misdirection comes into play in that previous statement by not telling you that just 12.6% of high school youth used ANY tobacco or nicotine product in 2023. Compare this to 28.4% a little over 20 years ago in 2002.

Additionally, cigarette smoking -- arguably the most harmful form of tobacco/nicotine use -- has dropped from 22.9% in 2002 to just 1.9% in 2023. The number of youth using tobacco AND nicotine products (including e-cigarettes) today is about HALF the number of youth who were smoking 20 years ago! (See graph above.)

The ALA spokesperson, Erica Heartquist, "told the Capital Chronicle that 75% of 11th graders who use tobacco consume flavored products. But that appeal wanes with age: Two-thirds of adults in Oregon aged 18 to 24 reported consuming flavored nicotine products, while half that of those 25 to 34 did and only 13% of adults at least 35 years old used flavored products."

More misdirection and omission of facts. The insinuation here is that adults have no interest in flavors, so flavors MUST only exist to attract youth.

What they don't tell you is that the adults over the age of 35 using "tobacco or nicotine products" are far more likely to still be SMOKING (partly due to anti-vaping scaremongering). Of course adults over age 35 aren't using flavored products, because most of them are smoking cigarettes and flavored cigarettes have been banned for about 15 years!

In Oregon, 12.6% of adults were smoking in 2021 and only 6.9% were using e-cigarettes. Most of the adults using e-cigarettes in 2021 were under the age of 35. Conversely, 10.8% of 11th graders were vaping in 2022 and smoking had dropped to just 3.2% (down from 19.9% in 2002.) Furthermore, vaping in that group was down SIGNIFICANTLY from the high of 23.4% in 2019. (See: Oregon Health Authority : Oregon Tobacco Facts : Tobacco Prevention : State of Oregon)

This graph illustrates how more vaping in these age groups corresponds with more flavor use, while more smoking corresponds with less flavor use:

casaa-graph-oregon-11th-grade-and-adult-vaping-vs-smoking-vs-flavor-use-jpg.1018225


However, when you survey adults who exclusively use smoke-free nicotine products, they prefer non-tobacco flavors, as well. One study found that "among current vapers, the percentage of those who used flavored e-cigarettes was higher for adults aged 18-24 years (89.6%), 25-34 years (86.7%), and 35-44 years (76.0%) than for adults aged 45 years and older (60.4%)," but note how even the 45 years and older group of vapers was not much lower than the 75% for 11th graders.

Screenshot (1163).png


See: Prevalence of Flavored e-Cigarette Use Among Subpopulations of Adults in the United States

And that, dear readers, is how they are able to mislead the public with "facts" while still hiding the truth. Now you know.

READ ARTICLE: Use of flavored nicotine products poses ‘critical’ clinical challenges, review says | The Lund Report
 

Attachments

  • CASAA Graph Oregon 11th Grade and Adult Vaping vs Smoking vs Flavor Use.jpg
    CASAA Graph Oregon 11th Grade and Adult Vaping vs Smoking vs Flavor Use.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 22

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
What this article doesn't tell you is that high school SMOKING is also still much higher in Ohio (3.3%) and Kentucky (4.4%) than the national average (1.9%), as well.

They urge parents to "to talk to their kids about the dangers of vaping," but more adults -- many of them parents -- are also smoking more in Ohio (17.1%) and Kentucky (17.4%) than the national average (11.5%). Children of parents who smoke are far more likely to start smoking.

The good news is that adults seem to be moving towards safer e-cigarettes in Ohio (8.7%) and Kentucky (10.3%) at a higher rate than the national average (4.5% in 2021), as well. It may be that the children of parents who smoke/vape are actually vaping instead of smoking, but it seems no one wants to bother to look into that possibility.

Why does Public Health seem more worried about youth in Ohio and Kentucky vaping low risk e-cigarettes at a higher rate than the national average than the youth AND adults smoking deadly cigarettes at a higher rate than the national average?


Screenshot (1166).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"The real smokescreen here is that tobacco control advocates like the ALA have shifted from a strategy of misinformation to one of disinformation; that is, intentionally spreading false information to influence public opinion....

"Moreover, by using “the children” to fearmonger, the ALA continues a long-standing national tradition of promoting “abstinence for all” over solutions that can save lives....

"Rather than finding new ways to help smokers kick the habit, the ALA is hell-bent on toppling Big Tobacco to meet its strategic imperative to create a tobacco-free future (which apparently now includes nicotine), though there is not a single precedent for full abstinence from any substance across the history of humankind."

~ Mazen Saleh and Jeffrey S. Smith, R street Institute

READ MORE: The Real Smokescreen is Nicotine Disinformation - R Street Institute

Screenshot (1167).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
This small study of 50 people who smoke concluded only that “there is a direct association between airway inflammation and respiratory mechanics in patients with asthma after the use of an e-cigarette."

Is it possible that vaping has a significantly lower impact on those with asthma than SMOKING did? Unfortunately, we don't know from this study, because the researchers didn't bother to seek an answer to that question. That’s a shame, because several hundred people who had asthma have reported to CASAA’s Testimonial Project that their symptoms had either significantly decreased or even disappeared completely after switching from smoking to vaping.

For example, Liana from Nevada wrote:
“I smoked for 34 years. I suffered from chronic bronchitis, asthma, and the beginnings of COPD. I tried nicotine gum and patches, counseling, etc. to quit, but nothing kept me from smoking long term. When I finally tried vaping, it worked! Within a couple months of vaping, all my respiratory problems disappeared. Vaping saved my life from the harmful effects of smoking. Every adult deserves access to safer alternatives to smoking, especially vaping.”

Interestingly, they didn't find ANY significant effects after vaping in the people who smoked and didn't have asthma, but that seemed to have no significance to them whatsoever. All they apparently wanted to find was "e-cigarettes bad."


Screenshot (1168).png
 

Users who are viewing this thread