I think what we're seeing in these articles and comments is what we know all too well: the ANTZ like GlANTZ will deliberately misinterpret and misclassify statistics, research results, and every little detail in an attempt to villify ecigs. When someone like SG applies the term "sidestream smoke" to ecigs, he is either ignorant or lying. While I doubt he's ever actually had a conversation with a vaper, I don't believe he's ignorant. So eventually statements like the one quoted in Seidman's blog are going to trip him up.
