I do not read any Threads with over 100 posts

[roosterado]

Do not have time to read the whole LONG threads and reading just parts of one is confusing

 

[Equilibrium]

okay

 

[eratikmind]

Do not have time to read the whole LONG threads and reading just parts of one is confusing

That's really unfortunate; some of the longer threads contain excellent information.

Given 2 restaurants, which are next to each other, one is empty and the other is crowded with a waiting list . . . Although, I may not have time to dine at the crowded restaurant, I would be sure to go back. As such, you may find the longer threads to be quite insightful and/or entertaining.

 

[daleron]

 

[Loopy1224]

Ok we'll try to keep them short.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DavidOck]

Guess I'm at the other end of that spectrum, I don't read any that have less than zero posts...

 

[twgbonehead]

Why does this make me want to post 99 responses here?

 

[DancingHeretik]

As long as you set the page length to be 40 posts (instead of 10), 100 posts is only 2 1/2 pages. A very quick read.

 

[YePsTeR]

Please don't read or count this as a post. Thank you ...have a nice day!!!

 

[joeybear]

Coming from a 4 month veteran, I'm sure you already know everything. Kudos to you

 

[msingletary]

Do not have time to read the whole LONG threads and reading just parts of one is confusing

SO, does that mean if this post goes over 100, you won't read it?

 

[Equilibrium]

I say keep'um coming.

 

[Shootist]

Do not have time to read the whole LONG threads and reading just parts of one is confusing

I'm the same way. As to most of the replies on the first page of this thread. What a bunch of jerks. I would of used a different word to describe them but that word would of been starred (*****) out. Just like opinions everyone has one. To bad they use that to type replies.

 

[Equilibrium]

I'm the same way. As to most of the replies on the first page of this thread. What a bunch of jerks. I would of used a different word to describe them but that word would of been starred (*****) out. Just like opinions everyone has one. To bad they use that to type replies.

Tizz all good
The beauty of an internet forum is *I* choose what to read, how much to read AND the info that I take from it.

Take what you need and leave the rest.

 

[msingletary]

I'm the same way. As to most of the replies on the first page of this thread. What a bunch of jerks. I would of used a different word to describe them but that word would of been starred (*****) out. Just like opinions everyone has one. To bad they use that to type replies.

The OP decided to post knowing full well the types of responses that would be received. Why else post something you know is going to be derided?

 

[wheezal]

what's to read? we all know long discussions ultimately break down into giant cake vs pie arguments regardless of the original topic.

that or pr0n.

 

[VannyPak]

The OP decided to post knowing full well the types of responses that would be received. Why else post something you know is going to be derided?

I agree. Come on, everyone here knows a thread with over 100 posts is probably something that you should be reading anyways. To start a thread with this title and content you're just being a .... stirrer and therefore any jerky or sarcastic responses should be expected...nay...required.


btw....I'll let you fill in the ....

 

[wheezal]

"a .... stirrer"


btw....I'll let you fill in the ....

cake batter?

 

[Equilibrium]

Starting a thread like this is almost akin to trolling. You know damn good and well the kind of replies you're gonna get.

 

[DancingHeretik]

It's when the threads get to be over 100 posts that they pique my curiosity enough to finally jump in and read them.