Hi, this seems to be the only forum I can post in, I know its the wrong one so sry about that.
I don't even have my ecigs yet and I'm already getting excited about playing w/ the design
The greatest failing of these products I can tell just from reading the forums seems to be the application of the liquid.
Now here's what I understand. The atomizer has a mesh bridge (I'm imagining a little arch pointing towards the cartridge here, so correct me if I'm wrong). This bridge presses lightly into the filler material, theoretically allowing it to wick the liquid up at a steady rate keeping its surface constantly covered in a thin layer for maximum vaporization.
Since this is the real world, it is almost impossible to get the filter at exactly the right density (and I should think placed in the right position) for the bridge to be constantly saturated. So instead people resort to saturating the bridge directly with drops of liquid which seems to me like a pain in the .... even if it is rather logical.
I was thinking of ways to make this easier. The basic principle seems to be a fibrous mesh which is saturated in liquid drawing more in through the use of cohesion (I would think anyway). The as the bridge dries up, the liquid in it attracts more from the filler to keep it optimally saturated.
So if the filler's too dry then the bridge cannot stay saturated, it overheats and maybe even burns some filler. If the filler is too wet then the bridge floods, maybe some runs off, it can't heat... correct?
So I was giving blood today and it gave me an idea. Everyone knows the little pipettes they use when they ..... your finger to get a small sample of blood. Blood wells up on your finger and the slight pressure and the various forces acting on water in confined places force it up the narrow pipette and hold it in there w/ no seals. So what I was thinking was that you would mount a pipette (probably fashioned from a narrow needle tip, or whatever was handing) or more as needed inside of the mouthpiece. This would be positioned (a blob of silicon and some steady hands should do for quick and dirty work) so that when the cartridge was fully onto the atomizer the pipette came into place a very small distance from the middle of the bridge. Think a bit wider than the width of a fingernail (this would be something you would monkey around w/ until you got it just right).
To fill the cart the tip of the pipette would be applied to the dropper bottle, one drop at a time until it was filled (or alternatively you could put however many drops you needed in a small dish and suck it up from there, but its been a while since chemistry class and I think you might need the pressure the dropper would provide for things to go smoothly). The next step would be to drip the bridge like normal to get it good and moist. Once the cartridge is placed on the two close bodies of liquid should naturally attract and attach. As the atomizer is fired up the liquid will evaporate from the bridge, which should in turn draw more liquid from the pipette to saturate the bridge.
This is all guesswork, but I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work. My biggest worry would be what happens to the liquid in the pipette once it gets up to higher temperatures - dunno how much heat would transfer in there. It should be relatively easy to test for someone who has an atomizer and a suitable bit of narrow pipe material handy though. I'll definitely be giving this a shot once I get mine, because I don't want inconsistent vapor and I don't want the hassle of constantly dripping. If this did work one should be able to get the effect of a drip with much longer times between re-application (or even the possibility to have enough carts preloaded for the auto-drip to last you the day, only having to drip in between carts).
Anyway, I know this is kind of a rant and I know I'm a noob so I don't have the experience w/ these devices that some of you guys do. It seems like a pretty simple concept to me though, and I'd love to know if any of you vets think it would work.
I don't even have my ecigs yet and I'm already getting excited about playing w/ the design
Now here's what I understand. The atomizer has a mesh bridge (I'm imagining a little arch pointing towards the cartridge here, so correct me if I'm wrong). This bridge presses lightly into the filler material, theoretically allowing it to wick the liquid up at a steady rate keeping its surface constantly covered in a thin layer for maximum vaporization.
Since this is the real world, it is almost impossible to get the filter at exactly the right density (and I should think placed in the right position) for the bridge to be constantly saturated. So instead people resort to saturating the bridge directly with drops of liquid which seems to me like a pain in the .... even if it is rather logical.
I was thinking of ways to make this easier. The basic principle seems to be a fibrous mesh which is saturated in liquid drawing more in through the use of cohesion (I would think anyway). The as the bridge dries up, the liquid in it attracts more from the filler to keep it optimally saturated.
So if the filler's too dry then the bridge cannot stay saturated, it overheats and maybe even burns some filler. If the filler is too wet then the bridge floods, maybe some runs off, it can't heat... correct?
So I was giving blood today and it gave me an idea. Everyone knows the little pipettes they use when they ..... your finger to get a small sample of blood. Blood wells up on your finger and the slight pressure and the various forces acting on water in confined places force it up the narrow pipette and hold it in there w/ no seals. So what I was thinking was that you would mount a pipette (probably fashioned from a narrow needle tip, or whatever was handing) or more as needed inside of the mouthpiece. This would be positioned (a blob of silicon and some steady hands should do for quick and dirty work) so that when the cartridge was fully onto the atomizer the pipette came into place a very small distance from the middle of the bridge. Think a bit wider than the width of a fingernail (this would be something you would monkey around w/ until you got it just right).
To fill the cart the tip of the pipette would be applied to the dropper bottle, one drop at a time until it was filled (or alternatively you could put however many drops you needed in a small dish and suck it up from there, but its been a while since chemistry class and I think you might need the pressure the dropper would provide for things to go smoothly). The next step would be to drip the bridge like normal to get it good and moist. Once the cartridge is placed on the two close bodies of liquid should naturally attract and attach. As the atomizer is fired up the liquid will evaporate from the bridge, which should in turn draw more liquid from the pipette to saturate the bridge.
This is all guesswork, but I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work. My biggest worry would be what happens to the liquid in the pipette once it gets up to higher temperatures - dunno how much heat would transfer in there. It should be relatively easy to test for someone who has an atomizer and a suitable bit of narrow pipe material handy though. I'll definitely be giving this a shot once I get mine, because I don't want inconsistent vapor and I don't want the hassle of constantly dripping. If this did work one should be able to get the effect of a drip with much longer times between re-application (or even the possibility to have enough carts preloaded for the auto-drip to last you the day, only having to drip in between carts).
Anyway, I know this is kind of a rant and I know I'm a noob so I don't have the experience w/ these devices that some of you guys do. It seems like a pretty simple concept to me though, and I'd love to know if any of you vets think it would work.