If only governments could take a lesson from the Prohibition era...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Silent Knight

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 24, 2013
98
104
Niagara region
...and realize that the more they try and ban things (like vaping) - the bigger the underground movement inevitably becomes.

I smoked cigs for 35 years - the last 10 years of which I bought illegal, tax-free 'native' cigarettes from a local Native reserve. Almost everyone I know buys their cigs from Native reserves (or from friends who mule for them). Why? As everyone knows - because the gov't taxation on non-Native cigarette brands is incredibly astronomical to afford.

i.e. - a large pack of DuMaurier king size in a convenience store is over $10 - compared to $1.75 for a pack of Native rollies. I'd buy a carton of Native smokes for $14 - compared to about $80 for name brand in the local variety store.

The result - a huge underground movement of people illegally buying the Native smokes. The savings were worth the risk of getting caught.

I read somewhere not long ago that in Chicago during the Prohibition era (1920-1933) - the number of illegal back-alley bars and speakeasys increased ten-fold. Alcohol consumption in major cities actually increased. Organized crime flourished with alcohol production, distribution and smuggling.

Today - ask anyone who lives in a border town in Canada where they commonly buy their alcohol. A large percentage will tell you they go across the border into the U.S. to pay a fraction of the price. My wife and routinely cross over to Buffalo, NY to buy beer ($26 for 24 Corona - compared to $46 here in Canada).

Simple economics.

Is this the road the government wants to take with vaping, too? Can they be that damned stupid?

What of the old adage - those who don't take a lesson from history are doomed to repeat it.
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
And I think it's a pretty good analogy actually. When asbestos ceiling tiles were in mass production, it was because the long term health effects of asbestos exposure weren't well known (or at least documented). Kind of like vaping.

Same with cigarettes. Have they been banned?
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
We know the long term effects of smoking, they are not the same.

I thought the whole point was that prohibition has caused detrimental effects. There haven't been any detrimental effects from banning asbestos. Cigarettes have been restricted, yet not banned. E-nic will also never be banned- at least not in the civilized world.
 

frank.gotch

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 19, 2013
315
174
Canada
I thought the whole point was that prohibition has caused detrimental effects. There haven't been any detrimental effects from banning asbestos. Cigarettes have been restricted, yet not banned. E-nic will also never be banned- at least not in the civilized world.

Well, let's just say you have a lot more faith in "civilized" government then I do. You're telling me the same people who send their young citizens into wars on faulty pretenses are above banning a product on a whim, maybe with the right sized contribution from the right lobbying group?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread