It's not steam, either, as the flyer refers to the exhaled vapor. The day I exhale steam is the day I am cooking myself.
are actually "Fog Machines"
It's not steam, either, as the flyer refers to the exhaled vapor. The day I exhale steam is the day I am cooking myself.
steam definition | Dictionary.comIt's not steam, either, as the flyer refers to the exhaled vapor. The day I exhale steam is the day I am cooking myself.
Here is the one that I can have made up.
That's pretty sweet.
I have to admit, I never thought of making it look good with a few graphics on it.
Yeah I am kinda weird like that I suppose. Here is something cool though, they fit nicely into the case I have for my E-cig. Spiffy huh?
I work with leather, and am thinking about designing and putting together a belt case for my 901, and my SD (Whenever I can get the stuff fot it). I'll have to remember to also put a pouch for cards such as these, too.
Hey! Now that is something that I would be interested in! One of the many reasons I wear a coat all year round is because they have pockets that sometimes my outfits dont have. I also vape a 901, so I would be interested in pics and the whole nine yards
I am also thinking about making some car mods for my 901. So it would be easier to travel on the road and all that rot.
I really hate it when posts in the forum inspire me -- I work as a web designer/print artist IRL -- and am starting up my design software as we speak...
/wave goodbye to the rest of the evening
hmm.. this sounds like a pretty good idea.. sometimes I get so tired of having to explain myself to passerby's...
This is my attempt at a card to give to analog smokers. I'd like your comments on design and content. I am not in the movie biz just like the clap board.
View attachment 2516
In case you are curious this is a business card design from vistaprint.com so it is available for anyone to make. If you like it feel free to create it.
capnemo, i like your design, and one thing i will say (in reference to all that say this) i think the word "harmless" or stating "w/o harmful effects" should be omitted. that's a pretty bold word, and very "matter or factly" stated. me personally, i would rather say something more generalized or something that doesn't sound as "factual" you know?
i mean, yes, we know that these are much safer, and that with all of us using them there have been no observable damages and they are MUCH better than analogs, but i don't think we can safely state they are "harmless" without the scientific research to prove it.
again, not bashing, not naysaying, but i would rather err on the side of caution when telling someone that type of info![]()