Innovative or ignorant? I vote ignorant...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jay-dub

Moved On
Oct 10, 2013
934
1,607
Kansas City, MO
I posed these questions in another thread but I was a bit off topic from the OP...


Why a coil instead of a spiral (like the heating element on an electric stove)? I figure the spiral shape would have more surface area. If it was recessed into a "wet stone" there would be no need for a wick or fear of burning it. The ignite button could also be a mechanical pump button to flush just enough liquid (a drop or two each push) into the recessed channels of the wet stone containing the spiral element. This would be for BCC tanks but seems like wet stone would be a lot easer to maintain. And, if you did your own coils at home you'd have a recessed spiral template that you just simply trace with the coil. Craziness?

Okay. Two questions. Why? And craziness?
 

tA71ana

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 26, 2012
1,243
2,530
Round N Round the Mulberry Bush
I posed these questions in another thread but I was a bit off topic from the OP...


Why a coil instead of a spiral (like the heating element on an electric stove)? I figure the spiral shape would have more surface area. If it was recessed into a "wet stone" there would be no need for a wick or fear of burning it. The ignite button could also be a mechanical pump button to flush just enough liquid (a drop or two each push) into the recessed channels of the wet stone containing the spiral element. This would be for BCC tanks but seems like wet stone would be a lot easer to maintain. And, if you did your own coils at home you'd have a recessed spiral template that you just simply trace with the coil. Craziness?

Okay. Two questions. Why? And craziness?

No, not ignorant nor crazy.
Brainstorming is the first step to innovation :toast:
 

Jay-dub

Moved On
Oct 10, 2013
934
1,607
Kansas City, MO
I've tried something like this before and put it on a bed of organic cotton. It worked pretty well but vapor production was mediocre at best.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

My hope was that a spiral in wet stone channels would be well saturated with liquid and produce a good vape. As soon as I get some spending money Imagonna play around with a routing tool and different rocks...
 

Thrasher

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 28, 2012
11,176
13,742
Madeira beach, Fla
ok something to mindful of.
several of the organic compounds (rocks as you put it) can release harmful substances when heated. so take that in consideration while breathing you experiments.

as for why a coil? vaping is just now opening the flood gates and many new ideas are yet to be discovered, what many newer people think are well established practices are actually recent inventions and ideas.

and quite simply when rebuilding started the idea was something better then a cartridge full of juice and the quickest way to rebuild something was to wrap a coil around some wick material.
poking around the rba then the actual modders forum will show a community hard at work brainstorming new ideas.

seems like a million years ago but i remember when some posted about this new thing called a genisis atomizer using SS mesh for a wick. and people using old syringe bodies for the first carto tanks.

One question: How would you supply efficient airflow?

this could be accomplished with something like the airtube in the Orion V3 it is a small tube that comes off the airhole and directs air onto the coil.
 

Revelene

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 29, 2013
576
474
Kentucky, USA
My hope was that a spiral in wet stone channels would be well saturated with liquid and produce a good vape. As soon as I get some spending money Imagonna play around with a routing tool and different rocks...

Definitely let us know how that turns out! I'm always on the hunt for different ways to vape and this idea could be a keeper.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
 

Thrasher

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 28, 2012
11,176
13,742
Madeira beach, Fla
My daughter, with asthma, uses a nebulizer which somehow creates a vapor out of a liquid, but I haven't for the life of me figured out how it, erm, nebulizes.
air pressure, it is more of a mist. somewhere in the UK i believe, they were working on an ecig that worked like this, dont know what came of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebulizer
 

GoodNews!

Moved On
Oct 25, 2013
577
136
Vaping, USA
I truly think that new systems need to be developed. I don't believe that the current coil-wick system (as it's bought in stores) does well with the properties of about %99 of the juices out there, which are made to be vaped. Vendors promote this coil-wick system as something anyone can use to fill-n-go. However, the assertion just doesn't stand up, and I hardly ever hear of a working device where someone didn't have to take out a wick, flip a grommet, replace the wick, let it soak over night, do 14 primer puffs, dripping juice all over the head, ect ect. I believe that for vaping to truly take off the ground, a system needs to be invented that works easily both for newbies and experienced vapers.

That being said, bottom-feeder devices (not bottom coil), from what I've seen, seem to be a pretty grand alternative. Not that I've tried one, but I really want to.
 

B1sh0p

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 30, 2013
943
1,239
Chicago
I truly think that new systems need to be developed. I don't believe that the current coil-wick system (as it's bought in stores) does well with the properties of about %99 of the juices out there, which are made to be vaped. Vendors promote this coil-wick system as something anyone can use to fill-n-go. However, the assertion just doesn't stand up, and I hardly ever hear of a working device where someone didn't have to take out a wick, flip a grommet, replace the wick, let it soak over night, do 14 primer puffs, dripping juice all over the head, ect ect. I believe that for vaping to truly take off the ground, a system needs to be invented that works easily both for newbies and experienced vapers.

That being said, bottom-feeder devices (not bottom coil), from what I've seen, seem to be a pretty grand alternative. Not that I've tried one, but I really want to.

Bottom feeders are coil/wick systems.
 

Iffy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 3, 2011
9,626
79,411
Florida Suncoast
You build 'it' and we'll...
spend.gif
 

D. Waterhouse

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 10, 2009
1,086
638
central WI USA
I truly think that new systems need to be developed. I don't believe that the current coil-wick system (as it's bought in stores) does well with the properties of about %99 of the juices out there, which are made to be vaped. Vendors promote this coil-wick system as something anyone can use to fill-n-go. However, the assertion just doesn't stand up, and I hardly ever hear of a working device where someone didn't have to take out a wick, flip a grommet, replace the wick, let it soak over night, do 14 primer puffs, dripping juice all over the head, ect ect. I believe that for vaping to truly take off the ground, a system needs to be invented that works easily both for newbies and experienced vapers.

That being said, bottom-feeder devices (not bottom coil), from what I've seen, seem to be a pretty grand alternative. Not that I've tried one, but I really want to.

Smoktech ARO Pyrex Glass BCC It's been plug and play for me for 3 months so far. You don't hear about the stuff that works because everybody on the forums is trying to find solutions for the stuff that doesn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread