From the article posted by the OP: (None of the current technologies "are the perfect delivery system but people that want a cheaper and more socially acceptable way of smoking will try what's out there until something sticks," Morningstar analyst Philip Gorham said.
"I am confident that e-cigs have a future and will likely get bigger," he said. ""What I don't know is which technology will win out.")
The market analyst doesnt know what technology will win out, but right in the article cigalikes sales are on the decline. (That should be what you call a tip, to him.) Perhaps this market analyst should stick to analyzing bumper stickers? Either that or Phillip Gorham market analyst is a leprechaun who is counting on the FDA to stomp out anything un cigalike. CAASA should keep that quip for court. It sounds premeditated. Morningstar is in the global information business. There is no possible way Philip Gorman can be an utter imbecile. He knows tanks are the tech thats winning, why then would he not know what technology is winning out? He knows alright what the consumers are preferring. Because of this, recently, Vapor Corp (VPCO) and Victory Electronic (Fin Brand, etc.) stock symbol-(ECIG) stock prices are on the decline. <<< cigalike vendors mostly, although, Vapor Corp sports some clearos with its acquisition of IVG just recently, and Victory under its FIN brand sports a few too.
All this is followed up by a quip that BT isnt going into tanks until "after the technology is more developed." That is flat out false, by the misplacement of fact. (More courtroom fodder.) Tank technology has surpassed and atrophied cartomizer technology. It's not even close. And the writer of the article apparently got this from BT. Tanks equal competition and less cash, cartomizers = big cash. (Cigalike disposable cartomizer technology is for practical purposes obsolete, non-disposable refillable cartomizers: Boge, Bauway etc has some limited market share potential, as well as tank cartos.)
With NJOY rolling out a new tank system this August, if the FDA had waited one year longer- they would have lost. Utterly. They would have been facing an avalanche of consumer preferences.
And what is RJ Reynolds doing? Continuing the rolling out of VUSE. Big companies use sophisticated marketing models based upon consumer preferences prior to marketing. You dont keep rolling out a model T, when the competition sports Cadillac sales. They have to be counting on a Vape FDA marathon. Prior actions = Prior knowledge = conspiracy theories will abound, if people will watch, what they just did. This is news - the bad news at that.
The other stuff is great news for vapers. The FDA now has to seek prohibition of the consumers' preference, instead of prohibition of a smaller market segment. <<< IMO this is a biggie. I knew tanks winning out would be coming, but I thought it would take a few years longer. What it means is places like ECF, other forums and local B&M's have produced lots of educated people. Tank technology has won both: 1) Consumer preference and by doing so: 2) are proving one time usable cigalike cartomizers are obsolete. It probably also means, people will never give up, despite what the FDA does. For the FDA, educated people = the writing is now on the wall.
ehhh baby its going to be gonkers. Vapaggedon.
There really is a lot in this short article by Reuters. It establishes placement of facts right prior to law. Its like a BT bank heist, they got there hand in the cash drawer before the law makes it seasonable.
I'll make a prediction Kent, if Vapeggedon happens-and I think it will, the first thing they ban is mods.(One of the reasons, its because they need too big of a strainer to go after tanks right away. If they ban mods they will need a smaller jack to get rid of the tanks they dont want.) Probably in November or so.
I got one of them copper penny mods from Focalecig. Dang thats a good mod, the button is super spring loaded so it works good-better than the 49.