Guy was probably an ex-smoker, some of them had to literally go insane with hatred in order to quit smoking, they lead angry and bitter lives.
Anyhoo, here's some half decent responses to news people arguments;
is a gateway device to create more smokers.
--It's not smoking. Smokers will not be created by the existence of vaporizors. We already have an environment where over the counter nicotine products are readily available to anyone with a credit card. The design of the device is very natural to an existing smoker, but pretty weird to someone who isn't already accustomed to the aesthetics of it.
makes people smoke more cigarettes.
--This was very possible with patches and gum, but it's VERY tough to vape and smoke at the same time.
has many candy flavors to entice children.
--This notion is absurd. There have been flavored cigarettes almost as long as there have been cigarettes. Suggesting that this was suddenly invented for personal vaporizers is a joke. Besides, why would children bother with an expensive device when they could just buy some cherry nicotine lozenges or mint nicotine gum, or better still, some flavored cigarettes?
makes you look stupid when you use it.
--That's a matter of opinion, but you look a good bit smarter than someone smoking a cigarette.
makes other people sick to see someone use it in public.
--Some people will be offended by anything they can contrive a half-baked reason for. With the personal vaporizer, they simply don't have a logical leg to stand on. It definitely doesn't harm bystanders.
Has you going through all the same motions, so you might as well smoke a real cigarette.
--True, but one tastes good, doesn't bother other people, and doesn't involve inhaling carcinogens. So it's true except for the whole SMOKING part.
is a fire hazard, and could explode.
--Smaller battery than a cell phone. There WAS once someone who got burned when they sat on their cellphone, somehow everyone involved survived.
is too noisy.
--Zero merit. Whoever said this was arguing just to argue
has not been approved for use by the FDA.
--Cigarettes have not been approved either, try asking any medical doctor which one you should use.
Might be more dangerous than smoking.
--Propylene glycol has been in widespread use for many decades, including testing via vapor inhalation in 1940's. If it was a notably dangerous substance, it wouldn't be in our medicines, food, makeup, cars and fog machines today.
contains nicotine, and that will harden your arteries, so you shouldn't be allowed to use it.
-- Nicotine is available over-the-counter at almost every store, as are cigarettes. It would be just as good an argument to complain about other people eating candy bars, fast food, or coffee and dohnuts.
indicates that your that filthy smoker who ruined our healthcare system.
--That's very much debatable and going a bit afeild, but anyone wanting to be rid of smokers should see personal vaporizers as an item that could get huge numbers of people away from cigarettes.
..and try to stay positive
