I am just wondering cause I have a 3 months old son and I have still been vaping outside and not around him. And if possible I would like to stay indoors due to our freezing temp.
Last edited:
Unless you are blowing it in his face you should be fine. Every device I have seen is pretty much the same when it comes to this. The vapor is gone in about 8 econds. stay 3 feet away and it should never even reach your son.
Happy to help! Amazing the freedom these devices give us isn't it?Thanks sooo soo much. huge help. I ammuch relieved.![]()
Happy to help! Amazing the freedom these devices give us isn't it?
The harmful effects from VG or PG is non-existent. In fact the anti-bacterial properties of both would negate any cause for harm.
Three experiments were undertaken, as follows:
1. 38 millilitre puff. After correcting for dilution, the most common cigarette smoke
toxicants were found to be either completely absent, or present in amounts less than 1
part per million. The LED at the tip of the e-cigarette was activated, indicating air was
pulled through the e-cigarette. The mean results from analysis of duplicate samples were as
follows:
Table 3.1.2 Compounds measured in first 38 ml sample of e-cigarette mist.
Compound Mean Units
1,3-butadiene not detected Ppm
Acetaldehyde 0.34 Ppm
Acetone 0.16 Ppm
Acrolein not detected Ppm
Acrylonitrile not detected Ppm
Benzene not detected Ppm
Ethanol 100 Ppm
Ethylene glycol not detected Ppm
Ethylene oxide not detected Ppm
Formaldehyde 0.25 Ppm
Hydrogen cyanide not detected Ppm
Cresol 0.16 Ppm
Xylene 0.18 Ppm
Nicotine not detected Ppm
Propylene glycol 32 Ppm
Propylene oxide not detected Ppm
Styrene 0.29 Ppm
Note: The limit of detection was 0.01 ppm and the limit of quantification was 0.025 ppm
for this analysis.
2. 58 milliliter puff. Analysis revealed that the concentration of propylene glycol was too
high for the SIFT-MS instrument, so a subsequent dilution was made bringing the overall
dilution to 1 part puff in 1500 parts air. The results obtained revealed a concentration of
approximately 0.5% propylene glycol (5000 ppm) in the original puff, but did not allow theresearchers to gain any reliable quantitative data for the toxicants.
that's not what we are saying. What we are saying is that vapor doesn't behave like smoke. Try it for your self. Blow a big puff of vapor out and count how many seconds before it's gone. Should be about 5-8. Real smoke hangs in the air for hours.I'd love to see an explanation of how one's lungs or airway mucous membranes are supposedly able to extract 98% of the nicotine and leave the vapor to be exhaled. I'm really having a hard time buying that.
Because inhaled nicotine is over 98% absorbed6, the exhaled smoke is propylene glycol
minus the nicotine, and any exhaled PG mist dissipates within seconds. ..
....
Seems that way, doesn't it!! Ruyan paid dearly for that testing, I'm so glad they were able to succeed to the point they have. NZ is in the grip of the no-smoking vise (as is the rest of the world), because of Anti-Smoking-Activist groups. I feel the testing was immensely important to us all. But a quirky thing happened: New Zealand Health defended their position against our FDA's position. It was wonderful!!Kate, is the FDA simply ignoring this report from New Zealand simply because it wasn't done by them? It sounds pretty thoroughly tested, in a way that would make anybody understand the effects of e-cigs and it's mass health effects in contrast to traditional tobacco cigs.