The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.

IVAQS Project Briefing

Discussion in 'NVC' started by TheBoogieman, Apr 7, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. kristin

    kristin Vaping Master ECF Veteran

    Aug 16, 2009
    CASAA - Wisconsin
    Which is why CASAA collected donations from its members a few months ago and forwarded the donations to CHANGE. However, while the study has yet to be completed, CASAA is still faced with fighting bans and addressing tobacco control and smokeless policies NOW. People were donating to IVAQS through CASAA, but not to CASAA, so CASAA's resources were being diverted to IVAQS donations, even though CASAA needed the funds more than ever. But we didn't want to keep people from donating to IVAQS, so while we took the IVAQS donation button off, we kept the info on there and directed people who wanted to donate just to IVAQS to the IVAQS site.

    Additionally, the controversy was beginning to swirl around whether or not IVAQS was ever going to be considered a respected and valid study and questions of impropriety. CASAA did not have any first-hand involvement in IVAQS, had no control of it, had no idea if it was being done properly and no experts to determine it and was seeing all of its funding getting diverted to it. We could not, in good conscience, comment about the study one way or another, because we were just not privy to the information nor did we have researchers on our board to make that determination.

    Finally, it made no sense to pour efforts and funding into such a big "maybe" when there were other expenses and actions needed elsewhere NOW. However, CASAA still sees the need for such a study and didn't want to appear to be discrediting IVAQS and hamper their efforts (CASAA would love to have a professional, credible, scientific study to point to in our our efforts to stop bans and poor legislation) so CASAA decided to be neutral and pull back from raising funds or being directly involved in ALL research projects and put the focus and funds back on the advocacy and education mission.

    Absolutely not. Remember that CASAA is NOT an e-cigarette organization. CASAA is a tobacco harm reduction organization. We do not promote any ONE specific method of harm reduction, we promote what works for smokers to quit smoking and reduce their health risks. CASAA does not exist to promote or protect ANY industry. If something was just as dangerous as smoking, we would not promote it - including but not limited to e-cigarettes. Our mission is to get the truth and science-based facts out to the public, not conjecture and junk science.

    Completely and absolutely way off base. Read other comments above. "Any research efforts" means doing them or financing them ourselves. We continue to encourage and support researchers to do unbiased, professional, peer-reviewed studies. This is the statement CASAA released regarding our research policy:

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice