Ok. So before I begin, a little history about my near year experience with vaping. I began vaping with Blu and immediately switched to Puresmoker's Protege. I've vaped in almost every environment located here in Arizona and have had few problems. One particular job I had didn't know what it was and didn't allow me to inside even with the knowledge about it. But most people, places, and organizations that I've vaped in/or around have had positive feedback when I've handed out cards and educated them about it.
Now, I know there are many in the Vape community that look down on "public" vaporers and think that it is a complete lack of respect by doing so. For me; in my own opinion, I have to disagree. I've read many support articles that suggest us Vaporer's to not give fuel to fire by making similies between traditional "smoking" & vaping. I feel it is our duty to be passionette; not agressive, when stating our case to vape somewhere. Using terms like "smoke", "cigarette" and any other context used in direct correlation with traditional smoking should be removed from our vocabulary when talking to someone opposive to vaping. Letting them know the benefits to you and them in what vaping does in replacement to you as a person smoking an analog in their presence. We should take a stand with "well-equipped" knowledge, in the fight for vaping and being able to do it without prejudice. I do not condone aggressive, disrespectful vaping; but, from my experience with the correct terminology and preparation I've had little fight back when vaping where I want. Just my thoughts over the last few days when reviewing other posts regarding vaping in public. Lend me your thoughts and criticisms. All welcome!
Now, I know there are many in the Vape community that look down on "public" vaporers and think that it is a complete lack of respect by doing so. For me; in my own opinion, I have to disagree. I've read many support articles that suggest us Vaporer's to not give fuel to fire by making similies between traditional "smoking" & vaping. I feel it is our duty to be passionette; not agressive, when stating our case to vape somewhere. Using terms like "smoke", "cigarette" and any other context used in direct correlation with traditional smoking should be removed from our vocabulary when talking to someone opposive to vaping. Letting them know the benefits to you and them in what vaping does in replacement to you as a person smoking an analog in their presence. We should take a stand with "well-equipped" knowledge, in the fight for vaping and being able to do it without prejudice. I do not condone aggressive, disrespectful vaping; but, from my experience with the correct terminology and preparation I've had little fight back when vaping where I want. Just my thoughts over the last few days when reviewing other posts regarding vaping in public. Lend me your thoughts and criticisms. All welcome!