Kanger Subtank nano?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Highly recommend the nano. I didn't need the mini (for the rba section) as I already have drippers and a lemo for that.

Plus, rewicking the OCC heads is so simple. I just keep rewicking the same 2 original coils for the past few months. I get bored and then recoil them in just a few minutes.

is re wicking a better alternative to buying new coilheads?
 

Hdivr

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 23, 2011
354
229
Rolla MO
Works for me. I've reworked with plain ole organic cotton and rayon. I change wicks about every week or so even if they are still performing well.

I've never "needed" to recoil as I've never burned one out. I just wanted to see how easy it was to do.....lol

Why buy coil heads for 3 or 4 dollars apiece when you can buy a whole bag of cotton balls for a few bucks that will last years. This can be a really cheap hobby rather than paying 5 bucks or more for the stinkies.

I've rewicked numerous RDA's, RBA's, cartos, clearos, over the years. The nano with a 3mm single coil is one of the easiest.
 

USMCotaku

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 25, 2014
11,877
45,735
California
I've read that the RBA section from a Mini does not work in a Nano.

Why Exactly is that?

I keep looking at the Pictures of the Nano and Can't figure out why it Wouldn't?


Nano is to small, also if you look at the base of the mini rba, you will see the post is inset.. It fits into a ridge on the base. The nano and original full size don't have that, so the rba positive pin didn't make contact inside the base....no contact, no work :p
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,616
1
84,722
So-Cal
Nano is to small, also if you look at the base of the mini rba, you will see the post is inset.. It fits into a ridge on the base. The nano and original full size don't have that, so the rba positive pin didn't make contact inside the base....no contact, no work :p

Gotcha. Thanks USMCotaku.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread