Puffington Laboratories - April 1st 2009
Puffington has just completed Phase 1 of our e-cigarette testing cycle. These tests were accomplished using standard, generic pen-style e-personal-vaporizer devices. At the conclusion of our testing, we have determined the following:
Puffington Labs - Placing YOUR safety at the top of the list. Well...not the very top, but pretty close. Maybe third from the top. Or Fourth.
Puffington has just completed Phase 1 of our e-cigarette testing cycle. These tests were accomplished using standard, generic pen-style e-personal-vaporizer devices. At the conclusion of our testing, we have determined the following:
- Prior to installing the battery component of the device, our testers found the e-smoking process to be very unsatisfactory.
- Direct application of the e-liquid to various body parts also resulted in less than satisfactory results, although one male tester did find the application satisfying, though we suspect this was due to the chosen...appendage.
- Plugging the e-vaporizer directly into a 110 volt AC receptical not only resulted in unsatisfactory e-vaporizer performance, but additionally led to the retyping of this assessment following restoration of power to the computer.
- Accidentally lighting the e-vaporizer can produce harmful vapor, which when inhaled can cause the smoker to see various colors where no colors actually exist. Oh, and death.
- When using a USB battery pass though device to power the atomizer, smoke should ONLY be produced at the ATOMIZER end. Any smoke produced at the USB is not satisfactory, and once again resulted in having to retype this assessment.
- Our detailed, high-tech chemical analysis using the Chem-160QT Chemical Content
Analyzer revealed that we have NO idea how to use the Chem160QT Chemical Content Analyzer, Unless plutonium-167 is a component part of the e-liquid.
Puffington Labs - Placing YOUR safety at the top of the list. Well...not the very top, but pretty close. Maybe third from the top. Or Fourth.
