so recently i took on a new life insurance policy in which i applied for "preferred plus" status due to the fact that my only risk factor is the fact that i used to smoke... but now that i dont...
the wordage that is used in the questionaire is if i use tobacco products. tobacco.
so i get a letter in the mail stating that my premium has been adjusted to that of "tobacco". i called the underwriters and asked under what criteria were they assuming that i was using tobacco products. and they replied that it was the presence of nicotine in my urinalysis. well thats obvious!
so per their instruction i contested their findings by letting them know that i have been tobacco free for quite some time now, and dont plan on ever returning to tobacco usage because of my e-cig... which does deliver nicotine, just not from a source of tobacco.
i will send the letter of contest out today and hopefully they will reconsider their findings. but i was wondering if anyone else has any experience in this. and if there are any law types that can shed light on this matter, being that the provided medical history and their method of detection are, in modern times, two different things. can they still consider me a tobacco user just because of my use of nicotine? isnt it like telling me i dont qualify for lower premiums because i have caffeine in my system... not because i drink coffee, but because i like to eat chocolate???
the wordage that is used in the questionaire is if i use tobacco products. tobacco.
so i get a letter in the mail stating that my premium has been adjusted to that of "tobacco". i called the underwriters and asked under what criteria were they assuming that i was using tobacco products. and they replied that it was the presence of nicotine in my urinalysis. well thats obvious!
so per their instruction i contested their findings by letting them know that i have been tobacco free for quite some time now, and dont plan on ever returning to tobacco usage because of my e-cig... which does deliver nicotine, just not from a source of tobacco.
i will send the letter of contest out today and hopefully they will reconsider their findings. but i was wondering if anyone else has any experience in this. and if there are any law types that can shed light on this matter, being that the provided medical history and their method of detection are, in modern times, two different things. can they still consider me a tobacco user just because of my use of nicotine? isnt it like telling me i dont qualify for lower premiums because i have caffeine in my system... not because i drink coffee, but because i like to eat chocolate???