So FSUSA launched their lounge..
They are putting out a great product...
They gave us a great 30% off juice sale...
I must ask...when will the FSUSA teleportation system be put in place so my juice magically materializes the second it is ordered? This is the only improvement I am still waiting on from FSUSA!
(Oh, and a vape lounge in San Diego, CA. I've already got the spot picked out and I know someone who would be an excellent General Manager. **cough cough**)
Edit*** Cleo, while you do have a valid concern and I understand not wanting to put your CC information out on unsecured sites, this is a relatively common coding issue in e-commerce sites.
It is not so much a problem with their website as it is a problem with our browsers. The payment information is secured but by trying to allow us easier access to more content in the form of links it fools Firefox into thinking it is not secure. In fact it is only the links to products/reviews/ other sections of the site are not secure.
While I understand that this is not ideal, given that David and crew at FSUSA are trying to balance a lot of big steps right now and this may not be of the highest priority. They are in the process of opening the first ever vape lounge in the US, continuously adding flavors to their catalog, constantly providing us with sales to make our vaping more enjoyable and cheaper, monitoring and helping their community through this site...etc etc etc.
Ultimately, this is something I am sure they will look to fix in the future. However, given that the information you are concerned with is actually secure and the problems you were seeing were for all intents and purposes cosmetic..I do not think it is high on the list of priorities right now. If it was actually the case that their customer's information was not secured I have no doubt it would be priority number 1 regardless of all the other things FSUSA is trying to do to make the customer experience better.
Just my 2 cents, but I wouldn't miss out on FSUSA juice just because the website has a minor cosmetic deficiency that makes it appear to be a problem. Jusy FYI - I just checked the code and it is correct.
Thanks for the previous code-monkey poster for digging through that too!