Major Anti-Vaping Scientific Study Retracted

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vapeon4Life

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2020
419
2,376
Nevada, USA
"
vaping is supposed to be a form of harm reduction, that is, allow nicotine addicts to have access to the drug without the harmful tars and chemicals in cigarettes that cause cancer, heart disease, and other maladies.

Last year, the Journal of the American Heart Association published a study finding that vaping posed as great a heart risk as smoking itself. That study fueled public policies at all levels of government to stifle the industry. A lot of small business people had their livelihoods destroyed or damaged as a result.

Now, the study has been retracted — which is a very big deal in science because the editors are “concerned that the study conclusion is unreliable” due to what appears to have been an uncompleted peer review process..........."

Major Anti-Vaping Scientific Study Retracted | National Review


Score one for our side. 'They will not stop until tobacco becomes regulated like a hard drug - 'We will not stop until our rights, especially our right to use a less harmful form of tobacco, such as vaping,
is assured.
 
Last edited:

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,599
1
84,660
So-Cal
Matters not in the great scheme of things, excrement has a tendency to stick.

Bingo.

How many Governors or Heads of State Health Departments or Elected Political Officials are going to Pull Back from their Push to Ban e-Cigarettes just because a Study by Slantz that they used as supporting evidence was found to be Scientific Tripe?

All of them?
Half of them?
A few?

How about Zilch.

:facepalm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread