I posted my love for dripping last week, and jumping back on the bandwagon of people praising the advantages of dripping, I must say that my first and only rda so far is an Igo-L. Simple, effective, straight forward. I do wish it had the holes in the contacts for feeding the coil leads through, as the top screw style is a bit of a PITA.
I know that RBAs can vary in reliability, performance and quality of build.. and you really do get what you pay for. I am having enough issues with my AGA-T2 that I am paying it forward to another member here in the forums. I see that I will need to get an original to really experience what the designer meant in terms of performance. Is the same really true with RDAs?
I mean, threads to the battery, a pin and 1, 2 or 4 ground posts. I know that materials matter for conductivity, thread tolerances and longevity... but RDAs seem so mechanically simple that I can't imagine that there is a world of difference between a $30 rda and a $130 RDA. The key areas of difference would seem to be: Engineering and build quality, quality of materials used, precision and tolerances of things like threading and airflow... but these things don't seem to be that much of a difference in value.
I am not talking about a clone vs. original, I mean low end vs. high end (although I must admit that I am not familiar enough with every device to know if the Igo-L is a clone of something else) I prefer not to support clones, and this is not the thread for that discussion.. there are plenty of others. I just want to know if there really is $100 worth of difference in performance in something that has no tank, seals, vaccuum considerations, feed considerations and engineering...
I would like to have a couple more RDAs in my life, for a couple of reasons, and I am just feeling out if the upper end is worth stretching an already thin budget for.
WOW.. that was a long-winded question... I should go into politics.
I know that RBAs can vary in reliability, performance and quality of build.. and you really do get what you pay for. I am having enough issues with my AGA-T2 that I am paying it forward to another member here in the forums. I see that I will need to get an original to really experience what the designer meant in terms of performance. Is the same really true with RDAs?
I mean, threads to the battery, a pin and 1, 2 or 4 ground posts. I know that materials matter for conductivity, thread tolerances and longevity... but RDAs seem so mechanically simple that I can't imagine that there is a world of difference between a $30 rda and a $130 RDA. The key areas of difference would seem to be: Engineering and build quality, quality of materials used, precision and tolerances of things like threading and airflow... but these things don't seem to be that much of a difference in value.
I am not talking about a clone vs. original, I mean low end vs. high end (although I must admit that I am not familiar enough with every device to know if the Igo-L is a clone of something else) I prefer not to support clones, and this is not the thread for that discussion.. there are plenty of others. I just want to know if there really is $100 worth of difference in performance in something that has no tank, seals, vaccuum considerations, feed considerations and engineering...
I would like to have a couple more RDAs in my life, for a couple of reasons, and I am just feeling out if the upper end is worth stretching an already thin budget for.
WOW.. that was a long-winded question... I should go into politics.