Maryland legislation would increase cig tax to $3/pack, increase smokeless tax to 95% or $3/can

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Maryland legislation (HB 683 & SB 700) would increase cigarette tax from $2 to $3 per pack, increase smokeless tax from 30% to 95% of wholesale price (or to $3 per can), increase tax on most cigars from 30% to 95% of wholesale price (with cap of $3 per cigar).
MD Legislature
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2013RS/bills/hb/hb0683F.pdf
MD Legislature
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2013RS/bills/sb/sb0700F.pdf

The good news for vapers is that neither of these bills would tax e-cigarettes, which is pretty amazing considering that former FDA Deputy Commissioner Josh Sharfstein (who unlawfully banned e-cigs in 2009) is Maryland's Secretary of Health, the FDA campuses are located in Maryland, and most FDA employees live in Maryland.
 
Last edited:

sonicdsl

Wandering life's highway
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 11, 2011
17,744
19,245
Maryland legislation (HB 683 & SB 700) would increase cigarette tax from $2 to $3 per pack, increase smokeless tax from 30% to 95% of wholesale price (or to $3 per can), increase tax on most cigars from 30% to 95% of wholesale price (with cap of $3 per cigar).
MD Legislature
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2013RS/bills/hb/hb0683F.pdf
MD Legislature
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2013RS/bills/sb/sb0700F.pdf

The good news for vapers is that neither of these bills would tax e-cigarettes, which is pretty amazing considering that former FDA Deputy Commissioner Josh Sharfstein (who unlawfully banned e-cigs in 2009) is Maryland's Secretary of Health, the FDA campuses are located in Maryland, and most FDA employees live in Maryland.

Looks like a CASAA CTA is needed for at least the smokeless stuff!!
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
I sent the following e-mail letter to MD House Ways and Means Committee members today.
Sheila.Hixson@house.state.md.us, Frank.Turner@house.state.md.us, Kathy.Afzali@house.state.md.us, Kumar.Barve@house.state.md.us, Joseph.Boteler@house.state.md.us, Talmadge.Branch@house.state.md.us, Jon.Cardin@house.state.md.us, don.dwyer@house.state.md.us, Mark.Fisher@house.state.md.us, Bill.Frick@house.state.md.us, Ron.George@house.state.md.us, Carolyn.Howard@house.state.md.us, Jolene.Ivey@house.state.md.us, Anne.Kaiser@house.state.md.us, Eric.Luedtke@house.state.md.us, Aruna.Miller@house.state.md.us, LeRoy.Myers@house.state.md.us, Andrew.Serafini@house.state.md.us, Melvin.Stukes@house.state.md.us, Michael.Summers@house.state.md.us, Jay.Walker@house.state.md.us, alonzo.washington@house.state.md.us


To: Maryland House Ways and Means Committee Members
From: Bill Godshall, Executive Director, Smokefree Pennsylvania
RE: HB 683 tobacco Taxes

To improve public health while preventing a huge increase in tobacco smuggling and cross border sales from adjacent states, I urge you to amend the cigarette tax increase in HB 683 from $1/pack to $.50/pack and to reject any additional tax increase for Other tobacco Products (which were just doubled last year).

MD’s $2/pack cigarette tax and annual MSA payments already adequately reimburse the State for its expenditures caused by cigarette smoking. While further increases in cigarette taxes will encourage some smokers to quit and will prevent more youth from smoking, raising the tax to $3/pack would sharply increase organized crime cigarette smuggling from Virginia and would sharply increase cross border sales from all adjacent states due to huge tax differences (i.e. VA $.30, WV $.55, PA $1.60, DE $1.60). Thus, I suggest increasing MD’s cigarette tax by no more than $.50/pack (i.e. to $2.50/pack).

Cigarette smoking causes >99% of all tobacco attributable morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, while the use of Other Tobacco Products causes <1%. So there is no public health or fiscal justification for increasing MD’s tax rate for any Other Tobacco Products.

Consumption of moist snuff in the US has increased 54% during the past decade, with adult cigarette smokers accounting for the majority of new snuff users. Since moist snuff and other smokeless tobacco products are 99% less hazardous than cigarettes, smokers who switch to smokefree tobacco products reduce their morbidity and mortality risks nearly as much as by quitting all tobacco use.

But HB 683 would unfairly increase the smokeless tobacco tax from 30% to 95% (of wholesale price), which would encourage some smokeless tobacco users to switch back to far more hazardous cigarettes, and would discourage other smokers from switching to far less hazardous smokefree tobacco products.

HB 428 also would unfairly increase the cigar tax from 30% to 95% (of wholesale price) even though cigars are also significantly less hazardous than cigarettes (as most cigar smokers don’t inhale the smoke, and most don’t smoke cigars daily).

PA doesn’t tax smokeless tobacco or cigars, WV taxes OTP at 7% of wholesale price, VA taxes them at a similar rate, and DE taxes them at 15%. Most smokeless tobacco users and many cigar smokers in MD live within 15 miles of these adjacent states, and will simply travel out of state to buy the products if the MD legislature further increases OTP tax rates.

Finally, please note that youth consume <1% of tobacco products, and youth cigarette smoking has dropped sharply during the past 15 years. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that past month use of cigars, smokeless tobacco and pipe tobacco among youth 12-17 years ALL declined from 2007 to 2010.

Once again, I urge you increase MD’s cigarette tax by no more than $.50/pack and to reject any increase in the OTP tax.

Since I founded Smokefree Pennsylvania in 1990, we’ve successfully advocated policies to reduce indoor tobacco smoke pollution, reduce tobacco marketing to youth, increase cigarette tax rates, hold cigarette companies accountable in civil court, and in 2007 I convinced US Senator Mike Enzi to amend the Tobacco Control Act to require graphic warnings on all cigarette packs, which is now in federal litigation.

Please contact me anytime for additional information or assistance.

Sincerely,

William T. Godshall, MPH
Executive Director
Smokefree Pennsylvania
1926 Monongahela Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15218
412-351-5880
smokefree@compuserve.com
 

Petrodus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2010
7,702
8,132
Midwest
The Senate hearing is tomorrow. Please take action even if you do not use smokeless tobacco.
Remember, legislators will eventually try to apply the smokeless tobacco tax rate to e-cigarettes.
In EVERY State !!
If your state is not on the Call To Action list ... It's just a matter of time.
 

kazimir

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 8, 2012
82
102
DC
Not sure how credible the source is but:

Life-saving cigarette taxes

MBTPI supported legislation to add $1 per pack to Maryland’s tobacco taxes (HB 683/SB 700). This would have improved Maryland’s health by discouraging smoking, especially among young people. And it would have provided revenue which could be directed to health services. Both House and Senate bills died in committee, though. MBTPI will continue to support this measure on the principles of promoting good health and providing needed revenue.

http://marylandpolicy.blogspot.com/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread