Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Attacks Vaping Again

Status
Not open for further replies.

CarolT

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2011
803
1,439
Madison WI
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel must be the most anti-vaping hate factory anywhere. Not content with just parroting wire service spew, they publish their own fake exposés of supposedly "harmful chemicals" in e-cigarette liquids.

Lab tests reveal popular e-cigarette liquids contain harmful chemicals
http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/lab-tests-reveal-popular-e-cigarette-liquids-contain-harmful-chemicals-b99583582z1-334833961.html

Besides the usual fear-mongering about diacetyl, they also call nicotine "a stimulant tied to cardiovascular disease." These media phonies don't really care about peoples' health. If they did, they wouldn't turn a blind eye to the giant Tuskegee Experiment the health establishment has created, by falsely blaming peoples' lifestyles for diseases that are really caused by infection. The truth is that they hate our freedom, and they want us to be crushed under the boot heels of politically privileged charlatans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skoony

Mazinny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2013
4,263
22,713
NY
If they did, they wouldn't turn a blind eye to the giant Tuskegee Experiment the health establishment has created, by falsely blaming peoples' lifestyles for diseases that are really caused by infection. The truth is that they hate our freedom, and they want us to be crushed under the boot heels of politically privileged charlatans.
I don't frequent this sub-forum too often, but when I do I often find a reference to "infection" . I'm sorry if you have explained this before, but could you explain briefly what exactly you are talking about. is it one specific infection or different ones you are claiming are mis-diagnosed and, which disease(s) do they cause. Lot's of diseases are attributed to lifestyle choices at least partially.

Edit : Never mind, I read the other thread.
 
Last edited:

Moonbogg

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 18, 2014
738
1,139
Whittier, CA, USA
No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.

There's a great line in some movie, I have no idea which... "You keep saying that, and it keeps... not happening." Which is not to say that *I* vape diketones... but I'm an extremely risk-averse person; to me, gambling is just plain crazy, so I choose not to.

But the diketone situation for vaping is very far from being actually researched in depth. What's that line the ANTZ are so fond of... "We just don't know." And we really don't. We may suspect... but that's a long, long way from knowing.

:D
Andria
 

CarolT

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2011
803
1,439
Madison WI
No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.
Avoiding all diacetyl would be very hard, because it's naturally produced by bacteria from sweat.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25390046/
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.

this diketones thing..... that's something to do with flavors, right?
 

puffon

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • Sep 18, 2014
    5,930
    15,765
    Florida
    Seems the publication has several anti-vaping articles.
    They even state cinnamon flavor, chocolate, grape, apple, cotton candy and bubble gum flavors may cause:
    "symptoms such as tremors, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headaches, sweating, swelling, rapid heart rate, coughing and irritability."
    I bet they would even find issues with my unflavored..........
     

    Jman8

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Jan 15, 2013
    6,419
    12,928
    Wisconsin
    No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.

    How many lungs have been destroyed from vaping diketones?

    I'll be waiting on your answer to that question for about 30 more years. If you care to answer it honestly right now, I'd welcome it.

    If we could just get rid of the diketones, the flavors, the nicotine, the recreational use of vaping, the claims that it reduces cigarette cravings, the PG, the VG, and all the gear that people use, then they would have NOTHING to attack us with anymore.

    Why won't you fellow vapers listen to me? We just need to appease our ANTZ overlords and get rid of all the things that might someday pose some danger to someone. If we can do this, I'm sure we'll be good to go for enjoyable vaping for at least a day. Maybe two!
     

    AndriaD

    Reviewer / Blogger
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Jan 24, 2014
    21,253
    50,807
    64
    LawrencevilleGA
    angryvaper.crypticsites.com
    How many lungs have been destroyed from vaping diketones?

    I'll be waiting on your answer to that question for about 30 more years. If you care to answer it honestly right now, I'd welcome it.

    If we could just get rid of the diketones, the flavors, the nicotine, the recreational use of vaping, the claims that it reduces cigarette cravings, the PG, the VG, and all the gear that people use, then they would have NOTHING to attack us with anymore.

    Why won't you fellow vapers listen to me? We just need to appease our ANTZ overlords and get rid of all the things that might someday pose some danger to someone. If we can do this, I'm sure we'll be good to go for enjoyable vaping for at least a day. Maybe two!

    Couldn't we just get rid of the ANTZ overlords? Seems a lot more logical to me. I still think firing them into space is the best solution; nobody's smoking out there.

    Andria
     
    • Like
    Reactions: CarolT

    AndriaD

    Reviewer / Blogger
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Jan 24, 2014
    21,253
    50,807
    64
    LawrencevilleGA
    angryvaper.crypticsites.com
    The bottom of the ocean would be cheaper.

    True! Nobody smoking down there either -- they'd be right in their element (all washed up and wet behind the ears!). But they'd probably have a problem with those deep hot-water vents, and start creating havoc for the fish. Space might be more costly, but at least they wouldn't bother anyone out there.

    Andria
     

    roxynoodle

    Unregistered Supplier
    ECF Veteran
    Jun 19, 2014
    15,344
    37,213
    Ohio
    True! Nobody smoking down there either -- they'd be right in their element (all washed up and wet behind the ears!). But they'd probably have a problem with those deep hot-water vents, and start creating havoc for the fish. Space might be more costly, but at least they wouldn't bother anyone out there.

    Andria

    Fish need to eat, too ;). So do those poor Orcas at Sea World.
     

    mcclintock

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
  • Oct 28, 2014
    1,547
    1,787
    The article claims people are vaping huge amounts of diacetyl, yet says it's because normal testing isn't sensitive enough. They disclose no numbers from their tests. I expect it's at trace levels, which is known. They don't mention cigs also produce it. Acetyl prop has only recently been considered also very bad, and is a known issue considered to be in transition. The range of variation I find concerning, not that some newspaper finds detectable levels.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: nicnik

    nyiddle

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Apr 9, 2014
    2,826
    2,692
    USA. State: Inebriated.
    No, I think they got it pretty much spot on. Diketones are dangerous and should be avoided. I'm glad to see this specific warning in the media. If people would just lose the stupid diketones, the media wouldn't have anything to really stand on. They are grasping at straws already, and if we solved the diketones issue ourselves, then they would REALLY have nothing but hot air to throw around. But if we wait until people get hurt from diketone exposure, then they will have an incredible field day and lay waste to vaping and rightfully label it as being a DANGEROUS and LUNG DESTROYING activity.

    I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment. The "dangerous levels" are entirely impossible to quantify right now, everyone agrees, we don't really know how much will or won't hurt you. The safest option is to simply cut it out entirely before someone can link some disease directly to diketones. That would be the strongest platform any government agency has towards outright banning e-liquid/vaping.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Moonbogg

    AzPlumber

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Aug 28, 2011
    5,051
    9,789
    Arizona
    Then there's this.
    http://www.cardnochemrisk.com/~chem...OT_2014/Pierce_Diacetyl_SOT_2014_Abstract.pdf
    Thanks to @AzPlumber for this link. I had seen this a long time ago and
    forgot to archive it.
    Regards
    Mike

    More so than all these conflicting studies is the fact that there are no reported cases of DAP lungers from smoking or vaping. If having a history of smoking is a risk factor for BO (popcorn lung) we would have seen some ecig cases by now, certainly from dual users.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread