The more I use this thing the more in-love I am with it

This totally changes the game in my vape-world. Now I can focus on what I'm doing instead of how wet my atomizer is
And thanks for the hookup, GotVapes

we are very happy with how out of the box ready to vape it is, just fill and vape.
The more I use this thing the more in-love I am with itI started getting a whole lot of fluid building up above the cone-style seal after a nice vape session. I took off the cone seal, seated the cup seal tightly and moved the cone seal up so it presses against the tip and its working great now
This totally changes the game in my vape-world. Now I can focus on what I'm doing instead of how wet my atomizer is
And thanks for the hookup, GotVapes![]()
The more I use this thing the more in-love I am with itI started getting a whole lot of fluid building up above the cone-style seal after a nice vape session. I took off the cone seal, seated the cup seal tightly and moved the cone seal up so it presses against the tip and its working great now
![]()
I tried your tip and left a gap between the two gaskets so the top gasket was touching the tip (I just pushed it in with the tip for maximum space). I still get the som bit of juice coming up from the tip, but it is improved. I noticed now more juice gets trapped between the two gaskets rather than on top of the funnel gasket.
I've actually tried your tip! For me it really has performed well (less juice buildup) without the top cone-style gasket. Even though juice may get up there, and sometimes it looks like it's even getting in the mouthpiece (!!), I haven't gotten any in my mouth. Sometimes I notice the condensation-juice looks high, I forget about it, and now it's pretty minimal again. It must be falling back in. With the cone the juice seems to 'wick' further up the sides of the plastic toward the mouthpiece. But again, I haven't gotten any juice through the mouthpiece yet (on both how it came and either method) with the 1.5 (counting the fill on the video as a half) times I've filled it up. I was driving in the car, too, and with my high-strung setup that's not a gentle rideI thought I was going to have to take the mouthpiece off to empty it once and a while but the juice must fall back down when it gets large enough to overcome its adhesion to the sides or an unsolvable, mystic phenomena on those lines
So, how is this thing different than a larger ce2 clearomizer?
Hoping Chris could chime in here since he knows better than me. But... it's made by a different manufacturer I think. It uses welds instead of solder, the tube may be a different plastic, the tip and both gaskets have a different design. The engine design looks roughly the same. Functionally it's almost like a MAP tank, because the tube is so wide the wicks don't get pinched like they do in a CE2 so wicking tends to be better.