Need advise on kayfun clone received from fasttech!

[retic1959]

Thank you thats awesome information. Also, would you happen to know why can't i use the inlet of the kayfun clone. Will it be ok if I use a needle as recommended earlier.

I would highly recommend that you fill through the top , another member wound up pulling the whole valve out along with the needle , I wouldn't fill a genuine 3.1 through the fill valve either , the spring in there is tiny and bound to give out , but I find that the 3.1 design has better airflow than the R91% or lite clones so it's easier to dial in for flavor IMO .

 

[Thunderball]

Ive had excellent service out of mine so far ( had one from the original batch and one a month ago from FT) with no problems, but glad to know where to get the replacement screws now if needed.

Ive only filled mine from the fill hole once with no problems. I used a blunt tip syringe I had on hand. Since then, I always unscrew and fill from the top. I cant be bothered by the fill hole.
'
I can also say that the FT sold 3.1 is the best of the cloned 3.1's that I have which include the HCigar and Tobecco. The only one that has more quality is the original Kayfun ES.....which are not made anymore.

Awaiting the 4.0 this spring !!

 

[Thunderball]

I would highly recommend that you fill through the top , another member wound up pulling the whole valve out along with the needle , I wouldn't fill a genuine 3.1 through the fill valve either , the spring in there is tiny and bound to give out , but I find that the 3.1 design has better airflow than the R91% or lite clones so it's easier to dial in for flavor IMO .

Bingo on this !!

 

[retic1959]

Ive had excellent service out of mine so far ( had one from the original batch and one a month ago from FT) with no problems, but glad to know where to get the replacement screws now if needed. Ive only filled mine from the fill hole once with no problems. I used a blunt tip syringe I had on hand. Since then, I always unscrew and fill from the top. I cant be bothered by the fill hole. ' I can also say that the FT sold 3.1 is the best of the cloned 3.1's that I have which include the HCigar and Tobecco. The only one that has a bit more quality is the original Kayfun ES.

It's the luck of the draw , my hcigar's machining is superior to my FT 3.1 and my tobeco R91% clone , the threads on the tobeco were horrible and the insulator on the positive block is too thick causing the positive block to be 1mm higher than the negative , the threads on the FT 3.1 were smooth and the vape equals the hcigar , if you replace the screws on the FT 3.1 it's the best bang for the buck .

 

[umarbutt610]

I would highly recommend that you fill through the top , another member wound up pulling the whole valve out along with the needle , I wouldn't fill a genuine 3.1 through the fill valve either , the spring in there is tiny and bound to give out , but I find that the 3.1 design has better airflow than the R91% or lite clones so it's easier to dial in for flavor IMO .

Thank you I am doing the same and its not that difficult or time consuming.

 

[umarbutt610]

It's the luck of the draw , my hcigar's machining is superior to my FT 3.1 and my tobeco R91% clone , the threads on the tobeco were horrible and the insulator on the positive block is too thick causing the positive block to be 1mm higher than the negative , the threads on the FT 3.1 were smooth and the vape equals the hcigar , if you replace the screws on the FT 3.1 it's the best bang for the buck .

Yeah i agree. I wud say other than those two issues the device is awesome and well made I will still recommend with this kinda price.