Hey Im Just Browsing Trought This Website And Wanted To Post This , And These Are Not My Words But I Agree With Everything.
Videos About Nicotine:
- Learn More About Nicotine!
- Is Nicotine Bad For You?
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 2 ''The Nicotine Misconception''
About vaping:
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 1 ''Why They Hate Us''
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 2 ''The Nicotine Misconception''
- Truth About Vaping - Televison Commercial #1
- Truth About Vaping - EMERGENCY ALERT - Special Sessions
- Is Vaping Bad For You(We Dont Know What We Think We Know Is That Its ''Safer'')
Documents:
#1 - Secondhand vapor is not dangerous
#2 - Vaping can improve lung function for smokers
#3 - Nicotine alone is not powerfully addictive
#4 - E-cigarettes are not full of formaldehyde
#5 - Sweet vape flavors are not aimed at children
#6 - Vaping is substantially lower in toxins than smoking
#7 - Vaping can help people quit smoking
#8 - Vaping is not a gateway to smoking
#9 - Vaping is NOT as bad for you as smoking
#10 - Vapor has very low cancer risk
Videos About Nicotine:
- Learn More About Nicotine!
- Is Nicotine Bad For You?
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 2 ''The Nicotine Misconception''
About vaping:
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 1 ''Why They Hate Us''
- Truth About Vaping - Episode 2 ''The Nicotine Misconception''
- Truth About Vaping - Televison Commercial #1
- Truth About Vaping - EMERGENCY ALERT - Special Sessions
- Is Vaping Bad For You(We Dont Know What We Think We Know Is That Its ''Safer'')
Documents:
#1 - Secondhand vapor is not dangerous
#2 - Vaping can improve lung function for smokers
#3 - Nicotine alone is not powerfully addictive
#4 - E-cigarettes are not full of formaldehyde
#5 - Sweet vape flavors are not aimed at children
#6 - Vaping is substantially lower in toxins than smoking
#7 - Vaping can help people quit smoking
#8 - Vaping is not a gateway to smoking
#9 - Vaping is NOT as bad for you as smoking
#10 - Vapor has very low cancer risk
“Numerous anti-tobacco groups and health departments have repeatedly asserted that vaping is no less hazardous than smoking, but this claim is false,” wrote Dr. Michael Siegel of Boston University about this study, “and the present study adds significantly to the already substantial evidence that vaping is orders of magnitude safer than smoking.”
You’ve probably heard of the infamous “formaldehyde letter” in the New England Journal of Medicine, in which some researchers from Portland State University found that overheating some primitive top-coil clearomizers called CE4’s resulted in what they claimed were dangerous emissions of formaldehyde. The problem is that only the PSU smoking machines would be stupid enough to inhale the horrible flavor!
The study the letter was based on has been debunked by many subsequent studies — but most notably a 2017 paper from Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos, in which he documents his replication of the PSU study. He describes in detail how the other researchers used smoking machines to produce what vapers call “dry puffs” (or burnt hits), which no actual vapers would inhale. Then he takes the PSU scientists to task.
“In fact, such testing of e-cigarettes is not very different from overcooking food to the point of becoming an inedible piece of charcoal and then assuming that consumers would consume it and be exposed to the resulting carcinogenic compounds in their daily routine,” writes Dr. Farsalinos. “Accepting that e-cigarettes are less harmful than smoking, such an omission could result in unintendedly misleading smokers into thinking that there is little to be gained by switching to e-cigarettes.”
The study the letter was based on has been debunked by many subsequent studies — but most notably a 2017 paper from Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos, in which he documents his replication of the PSU study. He describes in detail how the other researchers used smoking machines to produce what vapers call “dry puffs” (or burnt hits), which no actual vapers would inhale. Then he takes the PSU scientists to task.
“In fact, such testing of e-cigarettes is not very different from overcooking food to the point of becoming an inedible piece of charcoal and then assuming that consumers would consume it and be exposed to the resulting carcinogenic compounds in their daily routine,” writes Dr. Farsalinos. “Accepting that e-cigarettes are less harmful than smoking, such an omission could result in unintendedly misleading smokers into thinking that there is little to be gained by switching to e-cigarettes.”
Drexel University’s Igor Burstyn, a toxicology expert, concluded that there is no risk to bystanders breathing vapor. (This study was crowd-funded by vapers through CASAA, by the way.)
“Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and thus pose no apparent concern,” wrote Burstyn.
“Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and thus pose no apparent concern,” wrote Burstyn.
We know how it is. You pick up a newspaper, turn on the TV, check into Facebook…and you know what’s lurking just ahead: more stories designed to scare everyone about vaping. Every day there’s a new one.
The news media seem jam packed with vaping lies and exaggerations — and they’re all based on supposed research from trusted academics. What can you do when your annoying co-worker brings up one of those gut-churning, teeth-grinding stories, and says, “Hey, you vape, don’t you?”
The news media seem jam packed with vaping lies and exaggerations — and they’re all based on supposed research from trusted academics. What can you do when your annoying co-worker brings up one of those gut-churning, teeth-grinding stories, and says, “Hey, you vape, don’t you?”
