Please sign this petition to keep e-cigs free of insane restrictions and taxes! WE NEED MORE SIGS!

Status
Not open for further replies.

frosting

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2011
1,351
843
Connecticut
Morgy, Its a sneaky bill. Its not out in the open "Hey this can tax the hell out of e-ciggs" There's a clause in the bill that determines anything tobacco related could be taxed. Since it's sugarcoated as a cigarette tax bill its concerning. Rare have cigarette taxes not passed. Hopefully it's opposed enough that the bill doesn't get any farther in the process! :)
 

erich

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 31, 2011
1,118
725
Atlanta, GA
Yeah anybody that enjoys vaping needs to sign this without a second thought!

I'm sorry, but WTH guys? This petition is plainly *NOT* a "petition to keep e-cigs free of insane restrictions and taxes!" A petition is a call upon a government to take action. For what action are we calling? "Recognize" can mean anything from
provide massive federal funding for the promotion and subsidization of
to
launch a full federal investigation under the jurisdiction of the FDA

Also, how is the popvox bill being interpreted to be related to PVs? "The Saving Lives by Lowering tobacco Use Act" redefines cigarette to include:

Discrete single-use unit. The term 'discrete single-use unit' means any product containing tobacco that
(A) is intended or expected to be consumed without being combusted; and
(B) is in the form of a lozenge, tablet, pill, pouch, dissolvable strip, or other discrete single-use or single-dose unit.​
 

frosting

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2011
1,351
843
Connecticut
Single use or single dose unit could be interpreted as such. It is yes, hard to know exactly how it will be.

Also, I found this which I was trying to earlier. Since I am unable to copy and paste from the bill itself, I will try to make this as accurate as possible.

(i) OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS : Any other product not otherwise described in this section and has been determined a Tobacco product by the FDA though its authorities under the Family Smoking Prevention and Control Act shall be taxed at a level equivalent to the tax rate of cigarettes on an estimated per use basis by the Secretary.


Nicotine is considered a tobacco product. This is where we may run into an issue with this bill if its able to keep moving. Even the CASAA is opposing it.
 

frosting

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2011
1,351
843
Connecticut
Yeah, and that is rather stupid; increasing the tax on all smoking cessation products as a means to reduce tobacco use. I've long been of the opinion that it's less about reducing use as raising revenue anyhow.

Bingo senor. I don't like it anymore then you do. Hopefully, the bill goes no where with so many passionately speaking against. But if it doesn't..... I suppose I'll be stocking up on nic before it gets enforced and going mad scientist DIY. Anybody have an extra lab-coat? :p
 

Clinton

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2010
364
82
54
NorCal - The place to be!
People. I'm just trying to help here, I'm not a political or legal genius and I did not start this post to ignite a debate, I did start it to HELP ALL VAPERS!

So please, sign the petition, whatever the hell it does, I've been led to believe it's good for us. And do the POPVOX thing too apparently. Sorry I'm too busy vaping to know EXACTLY what does what but if I can pass something on and post something that will help vapers I'm going to do it, pardon me if I didn't get the details EXACTLY right I just hope it HELPS! All I know is if we don't reach 5000 sigs in time it will be much more difficult for our cause.

Peace, love, and dense clouds of vapor.
 

erich

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 31, 2011
1,118
725
Atlanta, GA
Ok, I signed the popvox one in opposion with the following comment:

erich said:
I oppose S. 1403: IDEA Full Funding Act because it attempts to include smoking cessation devices under the same taxable rates as regular cigarettes under the alteration of Section 5702(m). Nicotine, extracted from tobacco in its purest form, removes the vast majority of harmful elements from tobacco to then be used in nicotine gum, lozenges, and other devices. This pure extracted nicotine could be "determined to be a tobacco product by the Food and Drug Administration," but the distinction needs to be made, or smoking cessation devices become targeted would be targeted with the same zeal as the tobacco products whose use they were designed to terminate

This is misguided at best. These products show the current best case scenario for ceasing tobacco use, their use providing better proven results than taxes designed to stem use. At worst, this is an obvious statement that the tax being levied actually has nothing to do with, "Saving Lives by Lowering Tobacco Use" and is instead simply a source of revenue. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume that the former is the case, because the latter would be deplorable.
 

laurel099

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread