... it's that accursed TOBH deck.
Looks like they just slightly revamped the PONTUS.
Pass.
Looks like they just slightly revamped the PONTUS.
Pass.
I received mine yesterday. Doing a dual 28g build at .6 ohms. The flavor was way muted until I put the right drip tip on there. Using a drip tip from an old iclear X.1 that I never really liked but the drip tip is great. Getting a real wet and tasty flavor out of it now. Real easy build. Quality is rock solid. It's heavy and very clean.
To the guy who wanted to run .2 ohm builds and wondered about heat. It does have cooling fins but I think having all that thick steel combined with the tank on top holds that heat in a bit. Doesn't bother me too much unless I go psycho chaining, but it really may be a factor for your low ohm super high watt builds.
All said and done, I love this thing. If you get one, ditch that drip tip and find a better one. Only downside I can really think of after a day. Subscribed and will report with anything else I find.
How is the dripping going ? Have read about some leaking through without people pushing down on the top.
Is there a kind of juice well that the wicks draw from ?
Since I'm coming from using tanks instead of drippers the flavor seems better than what I've been used to. If you're coming from using drippers it's probably not as flavorful compared to what you're used to.
I have one of these on the way. I also have a Big Dripper clone and the original Pontus (I wish every dripper had a dripping tank option). Interested in seeing the difference between this and the Pontus..
I look forward to hearing your thoughts. especially the Big Dripper vs the Revellove my BD but, can always use more toppers
![]()
It came in a few minutes after I made that post so I drove home and picked it up. So far, I have mixed feelings. What I liked most about the Pontus was how easy it was to refill -- just remove the glass section and poor your juice in like a Taifun GT or a ProTank. No more. They redesigned it so after you remove the glass section, you have to remove a fill screw as well. I HATE fill screws. While I am not sure if I will need to fill it with a needle yet, it will definitely take longer to fill and be more messy.
They reduced the size of the juice well. Since I haven't used it yet, I don't know how much of an issue this will be, but it's definitely smaller. On top of that, I think the top cap is a little further away from the coils than the Pontus is.
I'm really scratching my head on this next issue. There are four sets of air holes now. All of them open and close together. This makes no sense to me. Why do I want air entering the chamber on the opposite side of the coil? I'm not an engineer so perhaps it will work out, but my initial thought is this is a bizarre design for air flow. I was really hoping I could do a single coil build on it, but I don't think that will work so well now.
Again, this is just my initial impressions on an RBA I have not used yet so perhaps it will all work out.
I agree on the filling part. The Pontus is so easy to fill without using the fill screw. The Revel can only be filled using the fill screw because the air tube is attached to the bottom rather than the top like in the Pontus.
The juice well is a little bit smaller, but I haven't noticed a problem with that. Perhaps it might require dripping a bit sooner, but the pump action one the Revel is so much smoother it really doesn't matter. I measured them both and they are exactly the same height, and the air holes are the same distance from the top on both. I think it looks like they're farther away in the Revel because the tank is smaller. Kind of an optical illusion.
The way the air holes work indicates it's intended to be used as dual coil, but it's the same way in the Pontus with air holes on both sides. I use them both in single coil mode and it works just fine for me. YMMV.
So what are the extra sets of air holes for?