I'd like to see reviewer rankings.
1) reviewers may choose to submit themselves for ranking or not.
2) If a reviewer submits themself for ranking their nick is listed as a "poll" thread with the polls being a scale of 5 to 10 selections from poor to great. first post in the thread might be a extremely brief reviewer description, any outstanding qualifications (like head thermo dynamics scientist for the space program or whatever), bio, maybe what kind of things they generally review, how long they've been doing it, usual format used, video, written, etc. Thread is closed for posting, just the poll is open (is that possible?).
3) Anyone can view or vote.
Ideally the threads would be sorted or summarized somewhere in poll result order.
Enhancement would be a Consumer Reports type of ranking page with rating columns along the lines of presentation, technical content, subjective content, use of media, oratory skills, etc.
1) reviewers may choose to submit themselves for ranking or not.
2) If a reviewer submits themself for ranking their nick is listed as a "poll" thread with the polls being a scale of 5 to 10 selections from poor to great. first post in the thread might be a extremely brief reviewer description, any outstanding qualifications (like head thermo dynamics scientist for the space program or whatever), bio, maybe what kind of things they generally review, how long they've been doing it, usual format used, video, written, etc. Thread is closed for posting, just the poll is open (is that possible?).
3) Anyone can view or vote.
Ideally the threads would be sorted or summarized somewhere in poll result order.
Enhancement would be a Consumer Reports type of ranking page with rating columns along the lines of presentation, technical content, subjective content, use of media, oratory skills, etc.
