Rocky Mountain Vapor - 801 Attys

Status
Not open for further replies.

VaporPhreak

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2009
656
66
Indianapolis, IN
Maybe this should be posted in the reviews Section for RMV, but I wanted everyone to here this and maybe get some insite on why this is so.

I recently ordered 5 801 atomizers from RMV and a USB Passthrough. I first used the passthrough with one of my existing attys from TW. It was the usual vape from those attys, no real difference from my JS. Later on I attached one of the new attys to the passthrough to test them as they are High Bridge and I have never used one. First thing I noticed was these attys were not primed at all. Some may say this is bad, but I frankly was ecstatic! No Nasty Taste! Second, the vape was rather underwhelming from what I was used to with my TW attys, that is until I used it in the car. On any PC its so-so but I guess I am getting more voltage or something in the car as its UberVapor there. I was frankly not so satisfied, but they would do. Today at work I put the same attomizer from my passthrough in my JS and.... WOW! HUGE MASSIVE UBER VAPOR! And it only takes the slightest draw to get there. I have never been so satisfied since I started vaping. So moral of the story... if you have a JS and need a vapor boost... try an 801 high bridge atty from RMV.
 

nubee

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 24, 2009
1,496
14
IL, USA
I have and don't like the high bridge as I have to mod my carts to work with it.

But I do agree with you that the JS seems to facilitate the 801's draw and vapor production. If you look down at the connetor, you'll notice the + slot where the auto-batt hole is usually located. I think that allows a ton of airflow thru the batt hole and really improves the overall vapor production.

I really noticed this "difference" once I got my 801 Protege. Don't get me wrong, I love both for what they have and offer but there is a difference with my JS winning by a nose.

PS - I prefer the low bridge TW 801 attys
 

Richie G

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 15, 2009
1,986
562
66
Lawn Guyland, NY
I have and don't like the high bridge as I have to mod my carts to work with it.

But I do agree with you that the JS seems to facilitate the 801's draw and vapor production. If you look down at the connetor, you'll notice the + slot where the auto-batt hole is usually located. I think that allows a ton of airflow thru the batt hole and really improves the overall vapor production.

I really noticed this "difference" once I got my 801 Protege. Don't get me wrong, I love both for what they have and offer but there is a difference with my JS winning by a nose.

PS - I prefer the low bridge TW 801 attys

Nubee... you really want to try the m201 with the JS. It's a low bridge like the TW that doesn't leak and it's wider too. The + slot that you refer to inside the JS combined with the tight draw of the 201 (Litecigusa) simulates an analog with killer TH.

RMV's high bridge has to be the highest of them all. I use them to drip with but that's all for the same reason you stated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread