Yes, interesting reasoning but -unless the translation does not correspond, which is certainly possible- it seems also incorrect. There is a specific reference to "smoking", which requires combustion, and that is not how the e-cig works. Also, the second part of the sentence seems to imply that this is a problem if one smokes nicotine extracted from
tobacco leaf (see quoted sentence below). This should involve a ban on the sales of liquid, not of the device itself
Cigarettes prescribed in the
tobacco Business Act encompass substances that can be smoked like a cigarette even if no
tobacco leaf is used. Therefore, electronic cigarettes, an electronic device for intake and a filter with condensed nicotine extracted from tobacco leaf, correspond to cigarettes under the Tobacco Business Act.