Okay, maybe - I was basing my question on the cumulative previous posts on the topic as well - not just the one post. But, that post kinda made it sound like believers "know" the Shroud is what it is touted to be. I apologize if I misunderstood.
That's okay. I know that there are people who think that it's important. I don't think that blonde does though...

... you're such a hoot L! I'm no scholar or authority on the Shroud, that's for sure... but the person of the Shroud did appear to have been tortured, lanced in the side, & crucified. There was much blood in certain key 'areas' such as about the head (Like Christ's would have been where the crown of thorns would have been placed).... around the wrists and ankles, all across the backside, laceration under the ribs. The pollen, mold & flora within the shroud matches those that are indigenous to that area of Israel... and the 'image' appears to be quite superficial (unlike ink or paint) and to have been created by some type of 'energy'... (intense light)... something to that effect. The Show that I watched was on the History Channel I believe... it was quite compelling and convincing based on their findings. I believe Christ went into the Shroud 'broken' and bleeding... but was resurrected 'whole' and perfect.. in His glorified body... hence why I believe it's possible to have the blood and gore and yet a perfect imprint at the same time. Like a caterpillar morphing into a Butterfly within the same cocoon so to speak...