Smokefree Innotec, Inc. Retains International Law Firm With Expertise in Cigarette Regulatory Issues
- Thread starter mpetva
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I read this yesterday and had very positive thoughts that this company, at least, is taking the correct first step to approval. Facts: FDA approval is needed. It's hard to get. Only top lawyers have a snowball's chance of helping. Nice move.
Rumor has it that one of the major tobacco companies is behaind the "real" e-cig. The logo for Real e-cigs is very similar to Phillip Morris's shield with a crown on top.
http://www.rauchless.com/prod_002.htm
The placement of the name "Real" in the shield has also been used by PM with various brands.
http://www.rauchless.com/prod_002.htm
The placement of the name "Real" in the shield has also been used by PM with various brands.
Last edited:
How nice for them that supposedly independent thinking Reuters gives them this info-mercial.
The website and video look very amateur though.
And neither show any vapor cloud - perhaps that's the twist*. So it's a cigratette-looking inhaler (though heated).
And according to their attack on the e-cig, 'way lower nicotine': http://www.rauchless.com/prodfacts.pdf
All the use of 'smoking' a ballpoint pen!
*: nichrome coil heats only air which passes through (not around) the 'cart' which is just a traditional cig filter with a few molecules of nicotine absorbed. Put another way, lead balloon.
Last edited:
Disagree. When you start out with that premise you have lost the battle.
The FDA should only .... in if it can prove that these devices are harmful. In a free country you should be free to consume what you want without having to get it blessed by the authorities.
What you think the FDA SHOULD do and what it does are two different things. Hiring a high-powered law firm is about the only way to charter this craft through legal waters. Disagree all you want. Just read the history of e-smoking from its beginning to today. And know that Smokefree Innoctec didn't hire that firm just to spend large sums of money in an unnecessary way. Observe and learn. Good to see they've done that.
Smokefree Innotec will do what makes sense for their business. The only way they can ensure that their stockholders make money is for them to bring their product to market. Lining lawyers' pockets with money is one way they feel that they can do that.
My beef is with the fact that the FDA has a say so to begin with. You don't see anything wrong that this device falls under the jurisdiction of a corupt organization?
My beef is with the fact that the FDA has a say so to begin with. You don't see anything wrong that this device falls under the jurisdiction of a corupt organization?
Be cautious of any news coming from a penny stock.
I know thru experience. Both good and bad.
I know thru experience. Both good and bad.
It doesn't matter whether it's "Harmful" or not. It can still be ruled a drug/drug delivery combination device. FDA has very broad jurisdiction, or assumes it has jurisdiction, over many things by default, at this juncture. There are hundreds of thousands of things the FDA has to review, they just want to cover their butts and this is just one product of about 522,000 products and/or claims of products and/or complaints that are in cue to review (this year alone).
The bill to give FDA jurisdiction over tobacco was a REALLY bad idea. They are WAY too inundated with workload.....and now they are taking the T out of ATF..... It's like saying I want to trade in my used car to get the same used car from a different used car dealer....big waste of time and money. I know for fact that the FDA at this point is just taking all the ATF protocols and guidelines and laws on tobacco from the ATF site and applying the same stuff to their regulation rules etc. Seems stupid.
The bill to give FDA jurisdiction over tobacco was a REALLY bad idea. They are WAY too inundated with workload.....and now they are taking the T out of ATF..... It's like saying I want to trade in my used car to get the same used car from a different used car dealer....big waste of time and money. I know for fact that the FDA at this point is just taking all the ATF protocols and guidelines and laws on tobacco from the ATF site and applying the same stuff to their regulation rules etc. Seems stupid.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
