So, um... would the FDA be part of the 'Shutdown'?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Somebody said on the radio yesterday that the shutdown may stop food inspections. So I would say, yes the FDA would be considered non-essential.

Honestly the food inspections are the only thing they do that could be considered to have immediate life-threatening consequences. Approvals for drugs and devices already take a million years so what's an extra few weeks?
 

ClippinWings

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 12, 2011
1,641
1,889
The OC
Somebody said on the radio yesterday that the shutdown may stop food inspections. So I would say, yes the FDA would be considered non-essential.

Honestly the food inspections are the only thing they do that could be considered to have immediate life-threatening consequences. Approvals for drugs and devices already take a million years so what's an extra few weeks?

I ask because while it is a huge bureaucracy who's shut down could save money... You'd figure Obama would want to move forward with anything that could generate the type of tax revenue the Deeming regulations could.
 

pamdis

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 11, 2013
808
2,208
IL
Ironically, the government claims that shutdowns cost them extra money. I think I heard in the neighborhood of a billion dollars. I'd like to see the spreadsheet on that.

Probably because when they start up again, they pay overtime to the employees who were furloughed in order to catch up on their work. So if an employee misses one eight hour day unpaid today, when he returns, he works extra hours to catch up and gets paid time and a half for it.

(Don't know if this is actually true, but it wouldn't surprise me)
 

Petrodus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2010
7,702
8,132
Midwest
Most FDA workers to remain on the job

Roughly 55 percent of the Food and Drug Administration’s
personnel will dodge furloughs during the government shutdown,
according to the agency’s contingency plans.

That means the agency’s Oct. 31 target to propose
highly anticipated regulations for electronic cigarettes remains unchanged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread