SS Choice No. 7 Micro from ECigarettesChoice.com

Status
Not open for further replies.

xdunlapx

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2010
310
6
Ohio, USA
I received the No. 7 yesterday and fired it up and hated it. It produces very little vapor. Very little. And it only produces vapor when I do several primer puffs. What a piece of junk. Plus the kit cost $95. That should have been a tip-off for me not to buy it but I bought it before I came to this forum.

I called their customer service just a few moments ago and they were trying to send me another atomizer. Nope, I didn't want it. I just wanted to return the darn thing. So they are charging me a $15 restocking fee, along with charging me for the juice because I opened it. They charge $30 for 30ml bottle. Dang. So all in all I'm only going to get back about $50 instead of $95. How sad.

I recommend you do not buy from ECigarettesChoice.com EVER. Not liquids not a kit, nothing. Well, unless you want to be royally ripped off.
 

firhill

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 18, 2009
2,014
187
68
Port Huron MI./Ontario, CA.
So they are charging me a $15 restocking fee, along with charging me for the juice because I opened it. They charge $30 for 30ml bottle. Dang. So all in all I'm only going to get back about $50 instead of $95. How sad.

I recommend you do not buy from ECigarettesChoice.com EVER. Not liquids not a kit, nothing. Well, unless you want to be royally ripped off.

So, it cost ya $45 for a 30ml bottle of juice. I think you chose the better of two evils as you would have had less value if you kept the kit and juice for the $95.

Chalk it up to experience. By posting you at least have the satisfaction that you're contributing to (hopeful) demise of another overpriced seller.
 

mwa102464

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Oct 14, 2009
14,447
12,564
Outside of the Philadelphia Burbs, NJ & Fla
buy quality right from the start and you dont deal with all of this, maybe try the vaporkings.com site pick up some KR808D-1 Batt and some 901 Attys or an apater for a 510 and 510 Attys, or try a GGT, or go to altsmoke and just buy the dang silver bullet like I did and you will never ever look back owning all this top quality stuff. I have found so many people that say ahwwww this e-cig stuff isnt for me, then I look at what there using and say to myself heck it wouldnt be for me either if I where using what they where. It's just like anything else in this world, do you wanna drive a Maserati or own a used ford or chevy with 100k on the speedo ??? I choose the Maserati when vaping it's pretty cheap to do so and man am I a happy vapor
 

warped911

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 19, 2010
91
13
maine
my first e cig came from them orderd the disposible choice 7.. what a peice of crap.
Holds hardly any juice
the battery i got lasted only about 5 pulls then died
Tasted like copper.. pop a penny in your mouth youll get the idea..could have just be the juice that came in the cart. or the new atty or both.. anywho

the atty will screw into a joye battery so i can say the atty kinda sucks too ;-)


It's just like anything else in this world, do you wanna drive a Maserati or own a used ford or chevy with 100k on the speedo

Id go for the chevy if the speedo reads upto 100k mph dam thats fast ;-) i know what you ment but still take the chevy
 
Last edited:

quetzacoatl

Full Member
Aug 18, 2009
41
0
40
I received the No. 7 yesterday and fired it up and hated it. It produces very little vapor. Very little. And it only produces vapor when I do several primer puffs. What a piece of junk. Plus the kit cost $95. That should have been a tip-off for me not to buy it but I bought it before I came to this forum.

I called their customer service just a few moments ago and they were trying to send me another atomizer. Nope, I didn't want it. I just wanted to return the darn thing. So they are charging me a $15 restocking fee, along with charging me for the juice because I opened it. They charge $30 for 30ml bottle. Dang. So all in all I'm only going to get back about $50 instead of $95. How sad.

I recommend you do not buy from ECigarettesChoice.com EVER. Not liquids not a kit, nothing. Well, unless you want to be royally ripped off.

I don't see how you purchased the No. 7 micro kit for $95, unless you're including the cost of the e-liquid in it. Those kits are $69 and have been for a while.

I'd also like to say that a couple of these "overpriced" suppliers are the only ones fighting the FDA in both the news and in the courtroom to protect your right to vape. Before you sling too much mud in their direction, I'd go see what they've done for this industry first. I've seen few companies spend as much money on press releases to keep the FDA's negative talk out of Google news so people don't see bad things about e-cigarettes nearly as often as they normally would.

I see people talk trash about Smoking Everywhere all over this forum and Legal One is here fighting for us obviously using SE's funding. My advice is not to bite the hand that feeds you, hoping to "contribute to the demise" is one of the most foolish things I've heard yet. These "big boys" are funding the survival of this industry, so think about that next time you vape anything. I'm not defending their products or their practices, but telling people not to buy from them "ever" just because you personally had a bad experience is not very bright. It's going to collectively take the big suppliers in this industry to finish this battle in our favor, including E Cigarettes Choice, Njoy, Smoking Everywhere, and other "overpriced" sellers that have joined or have the ability to join the fight.
 

firhill

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 18, 2009
2,014
187
68
Port Huron MI./Ontario, CA.
I'd also like to say that a couple of these "overpriced" suppliers are the only ones fighting the FDA ... Before you sling too much mud in their direction, I'd go see what they've done for this industry first.

I see people talk trash about Smoking Everywhere all over this forum and Legal One is here fighting for us obviously using SE's funding.

Huh?......Any chance you could show me something that suggests the supplier referred to all through this thread contributes one penny of all the overpriced items he sells to fighting the FDA.

Remember..I said supplier, not manufacturer.

Thanks
 

quetzacoatl

Full Member
Aug 18, 2009
41
0
40
Huh?......Any chance you could show me something that suggests the supplier referred to all through this thread contributes one penny of all the overpriced items he sells to fighting the FDA.

Remember..I said supplier, not manufacturer.

Thanks

Go look back through press releases that the company being referred to has put out attacking the FDA for its biased and deceptive practices throughout this whole thing (both this year and back into last summer). Every time there was a major event, they had a PR out about it. If Banzhaf posted a PR, they issued a response almost immediately, along with a couple of other companies, like E Cigarette Direct in the UK. I'd post some as proof, but press releases on this forum are forbidden from being posted when they mention a supplier. What's funny is, a press release can't cross the news wire without credits as to where the information came from or who submitted it, hence the inability of suppliers like E Cigarettes Choice to submit press releases without attaching their name to them in some capacity.

I'm not saying E Cig Choice is the best supplier/manufacturer out there (they manufacture the No. 7 brand) or that their decisions are always the best, but press releases are neither cheap nor free (if you use a news wire to put out your information to make sure it hits local news outlets, which is the fastest and most effective way to spread the word about anything). You can get free press releases through a few companies, but they don't get picked up very well. Some press releases can cost $50... others into the several hundred dollar range, depending on how many journalist outlets you want to hit. They blast the FDA and ASH on a fairly regular basis.

I've worked in online marketing for years and to send out press releases in the number they have over the last year isn't cheap. They don't fight the FDA in court, they fight them over the news wires. This is going to end up being a public relations war that most e-cigarette suppliers and manufacturers don't have the resources to fight.

You want to know who's fighting the FDA and ASH outside the courtroom? Go do some digging in Google news about e-cigarettes, ASH, and the FDA. If it wasn't sent out through a free PR service, it cost some bank. While smaller suppliers typically only send out "buy my stuff" press releases, companies like E Cigarettes Choice and E Cigarette Direct are actively fighting the good fight and are using their resources to help make sure whenever someone types in "e-cigarette" into Google, the news results show something positive about our movement more often than something negative. And that is worth its weight in gold.

Public opinion is swayed by the news media and has for the past 100 years. It's been said by propaganda specialists that no matter how big the lie is, the more the people will begin to believe it, as long as the lie continues to be shoved into their faces. The more the public sees "e-cigarettes are bad, says the FDA", the more the public will believe it. It's that simple, so there HAS to be an active counter argument in the public eye to keep things in our favor or it would easily give the FDA the public support to have banned these long ago. And if you read the wording on the FDA and special interest press releases, there were no facts involved. It was deceptions and slyly worded lies to sway public opinion and that's why Banzhaf puts out as many press releases as he does. This is a numbers game... well written press releases about our movement going out constantly is going to be the only way to keep public opinion in our favor... it's all about playing the game on ASH and the FDA's terms. If it's not played on their terms, we all lose. How do we lose? It's very simple; once public opinion is swayed, politicians can easily write in laws without opposition from the public that can easily undo what SE and Njoy are trying to do in court right now. It can all go away if public opinion is swayed in the other direction, whether it's before the court ruling, after the court ruling, or during. It can all go away just like that. Poof.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread