Subtank RBA vs OCC Air Flow

Status
Not open for further replies.

m00shie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 4, 2015
2,153
441
Malaysia
Okay...I've re-wicked my RBA today on a 0.9 ohm 28 kanthal 2mm ID coil. This time, I used fiber freaks (rayon), loosen it and ensure the it has slight friction going into the coil. For the tails, I ensure the it's parallel (slightly puffed) to the coil running down to the juice hole and ensure that there's a small split at the end so as I don't block the juice hole.

Tested it and...oh wow....the air flow is similar to the OCC. vaping it at 20W with a 4-5 seconds hard lung hit....awsome! Cloud is dense but not plenty due to small wrap on the coil (6/5 wraps) but the flavor is definetly there.

Next challenge....getting it right with cotton....
 

dleister1981

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2015
276
139
43
Michigan USA
Okay...I've re-wicked my RBA today on a 0.9 ohm 28 kanthal 2mm ID coil. This time, I used fiber freaks (rayon), loosen it and ensure the it has slight friction going into the coil. For the tails, I ensure the it's parallel (slightly puffed) to the coil running down to the juice hole and ensure that there's a small split at the end so as I don't block the juice hole.

Tested it and...oh wow....the air flow is similar to the OCC. Vaping it at 20W with a 4-5 seconds hard lung hit....awsome! Cloud is dense but not plenty due to small wrap on the coil (6/5 wraps) but the flavor is definetly there.

Next challenge....getting it right with cotton....

look up buttkickers on you tube he shows a very nice way to do it, it shows him taking it (a full size subtank rba with the first style small juice channels) to 50 or 60 watts with cotton and max VG juice
 

m00shie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 4, 2015
2,153
441
Malaysia
After 2 days of trial in wicking my RBA, I've finally got the wicking right to what I wanted....good air flow and ample amount of juice in the cotton for many variations of vape. Initially, I tried .... kickers' way...I could vape with the desired amount air flow (almost similar to OCC) but need to constantly vape hard as the cotton was less (at the tail end) and could not hold ample juice and needed the hard pull to suck juice from the tank. If I suck slowly or moderately, I get dry hits.

So I changed tactic, similar to .... kickers, I took out the top (dense) portion of the KGD cotton and started rolling the cotton and ensure the bottom (dense) portion is inside the roll. But instead of fluffing the tail ends...I leave the tail ends thick and maintain the "roll" shape as much as possible all the way to the juice hole. Then I prime the wick and make sure the roll shape is maintain as much as possible parallel to the "coil". On the tail end, I use tweezers or a pin to split the tails in the center to ensure the cotton does not block the juice hole. This will fan out the wick slightly at the end.

My theory for this build:
1) With the bottom (dense) part of the cotton inside the center of the roll, I maintain a reservoir of juice to cater for chain or hard vapes but as the dense portion is inside, I don't get flooding, leaks or popping.

2) As the juice hole in the subtank mini is somewhat small (without modifications), the dense portion (inside) of the cotton all the way to the tail helps to ensure ample liquid is available in the cotton while absorbing more from the tank so I can chain vape without dry hits

3) With the parallel (to the coil) shape of the cotton from end to end instead of fluffing or fanning the tail ends ensure smooth and ample air flow is generated. With this shape, my air flow is almost (if not the same) with the OCC build.

Just note that I'm not implying that other methods are incorrect or not right. Just that this build fits my personal preference of how I wanted the vape to feel like and thought I share it out :) In fact, other methods may have the same outcome but I was just terrible at wicking it that way..haha
 

Dioxyde

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 31, 2011
405
328
Oregon
Here's a pic of the airflow on the coil head vs. the airhole on the RBA post.

View attachment 417538

The inner diameter of the RBA post is larger than my 3.0 mm screwdriver, so I'm guessing it's probably about 3.5 mm. So in my mind, the most restrictive part is the 4 tiny holes at the bottom of the post.

So I dremeled those 4 holes into 2 slots, so it's no longer the point of restriction.

View attachment 417541

So after some test vapes, if feels less restrictive. But I have no way to quantify the amount. It's still not as airy as the heads, but better than it was. I'm gonna try a vertical coil next and see if that changes anything, because the coil placement is now the only restriction.

I also drilled out the RBA post and found only a slight increase in airflow, I think the bigger point of constriction comes from the top cap that goes into the rba chimney, if you look you can see it's a lot narrower, unfortunately I'm not sure there's much to be done about that one.
 

m00shie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 4, 2015
2,153
441
Malaysia
Actually, after various video tutorials and experiments...I found that the air flow is actually almost similar to the OCC. My issue with the airflow restriction was due to how I wicked the RBA.

I've managed to perfect the wicking using the method explained above which gives me a good amount of airflow.

Here's a sample of my wicking style (sorry for the bad lighting):
5_2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread