Yup if you want to tax it, make it a moral issue and the authoritarian types will get behind it.
I've already prepared myself for future regulation and taxation though education. Knowing how the devices function and being handy will cover the equipment and I got my initial DIY supplies over a month ago and so far nothing I've mixed is unvapable or even unpleasant.
Besides, by the time any such tax or regulation comes down I'll have a ProVari. I've heard tell that just to gaze upon it's magnificence will fulfill all your vaping desires. So suck it Uncle Sam![]()
I do wish I could recall the number of new IRS employees needed to enforce provisions of Affordable Care Act, but it's huge. Complexity is not going to stop our government from doing anything, even if it contradicts itself three times on every page.
Juice vendors could set up offshore and ship in plain packaging, as is done now with pharmaceuticals. Customs used to try to discourage this by holding and delaying shipments from any known med suppliers, under pressure from domestic sources, but apparently they gave this up. For the past couple of years I've been getting my meds in a reasonable time frame, less than a week from an island in the South Pacific ...
There are plenty of locations around the world that would welcome the trade and profits. I have no problem sidestepping an unjust tax that targets a desireable commodity. I seem to recall that's how this country started ...
I have to believe that the sheer magnitude of screening every box and envelope is just impractical, all kinds of stuff gets through Customs every day. Why not nic juices ?
Look, I'm still of the opinion that this whole thing - deeming, taxing... - beyond a State sales tax as assessed on any other taxable non non-taxable (political crap forces me to phrase things that way) - will go nowhere. It's simply too complicated (there I go again) for our gubbermint mindset to handle.
First you have that whole "tobacco" versus "what the hell is that?" problem. Tobacco - even something as complicated as a cigarette - well, Washington can figure it out. If it contains tobacco - tax it. When you get to something as "complicated" as roll your own stuff - if it contains tobacco (you know... tobacco), and it's a part that you stick the tobacco in that serves no other purpose - tax it.
The whole problem that keeps tripping everything up - from the FDA, regulation and taxation - is the complex (for Washington) matter of "what the hell is it?"
"It's tobacco." Well, duh - no, it isn't.
"It's nicotine." And so is all that stuff you already approve - like Nic-O-Gum & prescription inhalers. And when it's in pest control products and other stuff. So what?
"It's medicine." Perhaps, but that's a stretch. If it's really that bad then why did you let Nic-O-Gum et al slip into the realm of non-prescription OTC products?
"It's dangerous." Still waiting on those thousand of lawsuits, from people getting harmed by vaping. (Stupid doesn't count. Anyone can blow up a battery if you "Jackass" it enough.)
Then everything collapses under the heavy burden of Washington being unable to parse out the parts, so to speak. They don't know what to do with:
A battery is just a battery - except when it's in an e-cigarette. Take your 18650 battery outta your mod, stick it in your flashlight, and the tax man's head explodes.
Propylene Glycol is regulated and outrageously taxed - except when it's not in an e-cigarette. They can't level the playing field and just "tax it all" or any and every other industry that uses PG would be in a massive Lobbying hissy fit. Including and especially big pharma. Will Washington propose regulation and taxes based on intent? If you declare your purchase of VG in a CVS is for vaping will you pay more in taxes, but not if you say it's for baking? Gimme a break...
And polyfill and silica wick and electronic components and nichrome wire and on and on and... It's an e-cig "thing" - except when it isn't.
The problem Washington cannot overcome is that "e-cig" is actually more broad concept than narrowly defined execution. Put all these parts together and you end up with an e-cig. But all these individual parts make DC's head explode.
Oh... forgot about that whole "What the hell is it if there is zero nicotine in it?" problem they can't wrap their heads around too. Yet another concept versus execution brain fart for the Feds.
Gonna go vape some and not worry about our gubbermint getting something done. They are really good at accomplishing pretty much nothing these days.
![]()
the push from big tobacco is going to be to rid the market of bottled juice...they are going to put this stuff in tamper proof cartomizers in the name of "protecting the children"...the only way you will be able to get any nicotine liquid is inside one of these regulated cartomizers or to get a suppliers license which will be very costly
so the idea that you can just DIY is a wrong assumption
Is this taxation fueled by the government or by tobacco companies trying to keep people smoking instead of vaping? The tobacco companies probably have a lot of money and influence to keep this issue a complicated mess. Their money and influence is probably another reason for the lack of information on the safety and health benefits of e cigs vs. analog cigarettes. I think tobacco companies see vaping for what it is, the end of people being addicted to their products.
There are so many people here on both sides of the fence that must have awesome crystal balls. One of you mind telling me the winning lottery numbers for tomorrow?
you people who think bottled juice is still going to be sold after fda regulation are in for a big surprise
the push from big tobacco is going to be to rid the market of bottled juice...they are going to put this stuff in tamper proof cartomizers in the name of "protecting the children"...the only way you will be able to get any nicotine liquid is inside one of these regulated cartomizers or to get a suppliers license which will be very costly
so the idea that you can just DIY is a wrong assumption
as to a tax, the fda has no authority to tax a thing, only congress can and im here to tell you that they will tax the stuff at or near the current cigarette tax
what we need is a method of extracting our own nic...i know there have been posts about this but its very tedious....its not a simple as dropping a tabacco leaf into some PG...it requires some knowledge of chemistry and possible the erection of a still
Juice vendors could set up offshore and ship in plain packaging, as is done now with pharmaceuticals. Customs used to try to discourage this by holding and delaying shipments from any known med suppliers, under pressure from domestic sources, but apparently they gave this up. For the past couple of years I've been getting my meds in a reasonable time frame, less than a week from an island in the South Pacific ...
There are plenty of locations around the world that would welcome the trade and profits. I have no problem sidestepping an unjust tax that targets a desireable commodity. I seem to recall that's how this country started ...
I have to believe that the sheer magnitude of screening every box and envelope is just impractical, all kinds of stuff gets through Customs every day. Why not nic juices ?
I think i would go semi diy. Id but the 0 nic juices and add the nic to them myself(and taper down my nic content more rapidly)![]()