The counterfactual
- Thread starter somdcomputerguy
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
From the above Link...
"What should be done?
First, there needs to be clarity on the goal. The goal should be to reduce harm to the greatest extent possible as quickly as possible. It makes a huge difference to express the goal this way, rather than to aim to end nicotine use, “nicotine addiction”, stop Big tobacco or whatever other confused objectives are in play. The latter forecloses many effective and fast-acting options to reduce harm."
If the Goal was truly to Reduce Harm, the FDA would be doing what UK Health is doing. Embracing e-Cigarettes.
"What should be done?
First, there needs to be clarity on the goal. The goal should be to reduce harm to the greatest extent possible as quickly as possible. It makes a huge difference to express the goal this way, rather than to aim to end nicotine use, “nicotine addiction”, stop Big tobacco or whatever other confused objectives are in play. The latter forecloses many effective and fast-acting options to reduce harm."
If the Goal was truly to Reduce Harm, the FDA would be doing what UK Health is doing. Embracing e-Cigarettes.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
