The impacts of inhaling experience on consumers

[VOOPOO_Official]

Since everyone’s feeling will not be the same, each consumer has different inhaling experience. Therefore, there is not a clear standard of inhaling experience. If one E-cigarette meets factors explained yesterday and satisfy consumer’s requirement, then the consumer can judge the device will offer a good inhaling experience. However, if one device need to be used large power to inhale, and the low saturation of smoke in mouth and the weak resolving of the e-liquid, then the device can’t bring a good inhaling experience to customers. As for me, I prefer a relatively tighter draw because a larger amount of smoke full filling in the mouth. Meanwhile, the flavor is not too strong. Lastly, if nicotine resolved is a little weaker, it’s better to me. However, as far as I know, for most consumers in Europe and America, they’re more inclined to a relatively airy draw, because they usually prefer the inhaling experience of strong smoke, sweet flavor and totally nicotine resolved.

If the draw is too restricted, the consumer will use too large power to inhale. Otherwise, if the draw is too free, the result is that the amount of smoke will be unsaturated and consumers will feel inhale without force or lack of smoke. In addition, if the resolving of e-liquid is not totally, the users will feel sick. If slip back frequently happened, the users will feel uncomfortable, which will reduce the frequency of usage, even get scalded. Lastly, if the nicotine is excessively resolved, the users will be choked. Otherwise, if the nicotine is not sufficiently resolved, the users will feel dissatisfied. To sum up, once consumer is not satisfied with inhaling experience offered by a E-cigarette, the most direct consumer behavior is to give up the device.

 

[GOMuniEsq]

This article is poorly written fluff. What is 'resolving' supposed to mean, in this context? And 'scalded', 'choked'? It's sheer frivolity to write a pseudo-scientific piece about such a subjective experience. The writing is vague, generic and lacking in practical wisdom. A better article would cover the two main styles, direct-lung and mouth-to-lung; discuss the purpose of airflow controls; touch on draw-activation vs manual fire; provide examples of the relationship between nicotine strength, wattage, and puff size; then reassure readers that they will naturally gravitate to a method that works best for them.

 

[United States]

I understood it completely.

Has nothing to do with mtl or dtl. Has everything to do with what drag satisfies the user. Spitback, scalding hits and insufficient (or choking from high dose nic salts) nicotine issues lead to dissatisfied users, which leads to users not using a given device. ie returns to smoking.

It was more of an op-ed than a scientific statement. Thea likes a tight drag. European markets tend to go for a more airy drag (be it mtl or dtl).


I'll say this Thea, the drag I get from the Rota is just right. I prefer ceramic wicks but the Rota was/is a dam good smoking cessation device for those who need to fidget and like cotton wicks. Good flavor producer but the popping and cracking means I can't stealth vape in my office cubicle. I use ceramics because they are near silent and provide pretty good flavor day after day.