this is the thing thats makes most testing/reviews/evaluations invalid

[sattec]

The viscocity of the juice, even the temperature and the ingredients in the juice will/can dictate the performance of the burner/boil process. More VG is gonna flow slower and vape bigger than less VG. Not enough questions are being asked about the juice being used when claims are being made. Any results I've ever posted are arrived at using a 50% VG based juice, thats just what I like. I encourage others to include info regarding the composition of the juice when making statements regarding "tons of vape' and "great flavor". I'm not chewing anybody out but consider what I'm saying is all I ask....

 

[SLDS181]

Good point!

Maybe a 100% PG, 100% VG, 50/50 mix, as the review liquids.

 

[Nuck]

The amount of vapour visible in a video review is dependent on far more than the composition of the juice. Just a few of the things that can modify it dramatically:

-Humidity of the air
-Type of camera used
-Strength of inhale
-Background used to display vapour
-How deep the vapour is drawn into the lungs
-Direct inhale vs mouth inhale
-How long the vapour is held in the lungs

To determine if the claims are reasonable, combine the experience of the reviewer, how long they've had the model, how they acquired the model and if they have any vested interest in the product.

The reviews I tend to ignore are the over the top gushing ones. I find dispassionate reviews to be far more accurate with all products.

 

[sattec]

Good point!

Maybe a 100% PG, 100% VG, 50/50 mix, as the review liquids.

Way to go! Your chosing to be part of the solution! Plus voltage checks to KNOW the supply batt was at full power or state "power level unknown"

..lets try to tighten up the "specs" alittle....If I only knew it was 50-50 VG, I would appreciate it...