So Stan Glatz a is now an expert on what the FDA proposed rules are. Most analyst's who are worth there salt have that thought the regs give FDA sweeping authority not limited authority. Stan is also a lawyer now, indicating things are years and years away. Stan Glatz is talking like a cardiologist (corrected thanks DrMa...oops, but the rest is correct),,, this we know, a pretend lawyer, expert on FDA regs, whats next dancer? Or maybe its time to write a book, he wants to be a quadruple threat. And who is Stan Glatz really?
but consider the recipe here:
1) Industry is winning the battle, so vendors are happy church goers. (I talked to one the other day, he isnt the least bit concerned.)
2) THE FDA goes Krakow on business shutting many of them down.
3) In the end, the FDA didn't really do much- go read that Time article, they just did a "little bit", because industry was winning. Look at the happy vapers on blu ecigs.
4) In walks T. Denny Sanford, philanthropist billionaire who would like you to believe he never made a nickel on sick people, with his Cardiologists and salutes the FDA for helping keeping vaping away from kids. <<<< or some similar weirdo. Maybe will get donald trump himself, playing a leprechuan violin.
5) The save the kids from vaping act, is the scam they are running just google the web.
6) "Here they come to save the DAy."
7) Then obliterate the idea. Obliterate the idea that what the FDA did do wasnt perfect. By getting some Ben Rickels (a funny guy like Don Rickels) to do punishing humor, poking fun like poison at those who disagree at what the FDA did, on the David Letterman show or where ever. Then, you realize you are the object of ridicule if you open your mouth.
Sceptism isnt healthy until its real, >>>>>>>> I guess this makes me bad.
When central news media says industry is winning the battle,(which was the headline in this Time Article) I look at this as awful news not good news. Its because it is untruthful. Here is the prescription: Industry is winning, they cant win everything. The FDA goes Krakow, and it was some, just a little that they won. It was a draw, the FDA really didnt get all they wanted. And a cardiologist who takes care of dying people from tobacco, is your night and shining proof. These people are like watching someone sell a dairy queen in a laundry mat to the trained eye. This doctor all but alluded to this in the article, he says the regs dont go far enough. He acts like they are unfair to the consumer. This is false. And if they dont go far enough this dispels the idea that free market still isnt in place. John McCain, after all, has to keep his shoes on the right feet, as does Senator Durbin. Leprechauns are after all, sensitive to the idea that free market is the dominating principle in all, otherwise the NYSE would have to have a hernia.
Just wait until you run into "the bookie". who is he? He is a dude who flat out doesnt care what he does, because he will have a book wrote to conceal every last rotten lie he did, including his rotten underwear.
Also thanks to Kent C, for putting together what the FDA wants in comments on his thread. Take a look at Kents thread, the questions he ferreted out, look like a gigantic spiders web. Its like 50 road signs pointing in different directions. Heres a couple of my least favorite ones from Kent's list:
"When marketing of the new tobacco product is limited to existing adult users of the
product?When marketing of the new tobacco product is unlikely to be seen or received by
youth?" <<<<<< just how does one answer these questions really? they will try to turn you into Pinnochio if you try. And it also is the hammer they are going to use to shut off information. Its about the kids silly people dont you see? These are questions loaded with a vice.
At the end of the Time article is this summary quote: "The battle over e-cig regulation isn’t settled, but if what’s going on now is any indication, that battle may have actually been over—and won by industry—before it even started." At the end of the day, you can translate that into: The FDA only did a little bit, hardly anything at all. And that-no matter what they did.
