an understandable reaction really, lithium ion batteries in general are a restricted item for any type of air transport, they get classified the same way as chemical oxygen generators (the ones you find installed in the overhead dropdown masks on every airline)
You can carry them in the cabin, not in checked baggage.
an understandable reaction really, lithium ion batteries in general are a restricted item for any type of air transport, they get classified the same way as chemical oxygen generators (the ones you find installed in the overhead dropdown masks on every airline)
Investigators in Japan are investigating why a lithium-ion battery overheated on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner at Narita airport. Last year Boeing grounded its entire fleet of the next-generation plane after the lithium batteries on two of the aircraft caught fire.
Removing all li-ion batteries from flights may pose a problem, they're used in the planes.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/01/economist-explains-19
I would agree, except for the statement that the drop-down masks actually provide oxygen. (The bag "may not inflate")
Their primary purpose is psychological - they make you feel like there is something you can do and that the airline/manufacturer has considered this as a possibility and come up with a solution -- with the added side-effect that they stifle conversation.
Like they are required to teach you, at the beginning of every flight, how to fasten a seatbelt that has been illegal (no chest strap) in motor vehicles for how many years now because it doesn't actually provide protection on an impact, even in a car?
Assume the position.
Lithium ion batteries are amazing, I'm not arguing that, but firstly the dreamliner is a project plagued with problems and setbacks so referencing that is a little bit of a wash, also a proper installation of a lithium battery in an aircraft will include at least a double redundant safety system, your laptop however does not, neither did the pv in the originally referenced news story.Removing all li-ion batteries from flights may pose a problem, they're used in the planes.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/01/economist-explains-19
Lithium ion batteries are amazing, I'm not arguing that, but firstly the dreamliner is a project plagued with problems and setbacks so referencing that is a little bit of a wash, also a proper installation of a lithium battery in an aircraft will include at least a double redundant safety system, your laptop however does not, neither did the pv in the originally referenced news story.
Last year Boeing grounded its entire fleet of the next-generation plane after the lithium batteries on two of the aircraft caught fire. (The 787s returned to the air after being fitted with a modified system to protect the aircraft against battery fires.)
...or is it possible people who are anti-ecig could go to this length to make a "point" by deliberately ignoring safety?