You don't think it will be simply *her* "fault", for being a curious human being?
Curious about what exactly? The vapor I am exposing her to? Is it her fault I'm exposing her to that vapor? Do you think she would be curious about it if I wasn't exposing her to it?
And I'm trying to see where a "fault" lies, in someone vaping, and cannot see it. If you were abusive to her, and then she became abusive to her own kids, yeah, that would be your "fault". Is it your "fault" if she becomes a loving and caring person? I see no fault in that either, just as I see none in vaping.
Why are you not seeing it? Is it because the fault doesn't exist, or because you don't want to accept personal responsibility when your children emulate you?
Have you ever heard the expression "Lead by example"? How about "You grow up to be your parents"?
But just because a kid learns or becomes familiar with something at home, it does not *necessarily* follow that they will do that themselves.
Even when they are actively showing interested in it, and showing that interest because of your exposing them to it?
My mother was somewhat abusive to me, but I used her as my pattern of how NOT to raise my own child. I think it worked; my son has always had a very healthy sense of self-esteem, so I didn't manage to (s)mother it out of him, as my own did to me.
Andria
That's nice. I have the same story about my father.
But that is entirely irrelevant to this discussion. This discussion centers around my daughter who at the age of 13 is already showing interest in vaping specifically because I am exposing her to vapor that smells appealing to her. She smells the candy, she smells the vanilla, and she has already voiced the desire to know how it tastes. Whose fault is that, if not the person exposing her to it? Whose fault is it that this 13 year old girl wants to puff on her fathers ecig and know if it tastes as good as it smells?