Steve's pro-establishment discourse and arbitrary disparagement of vaping advocates has become infamous on ECF. I doubt there are many people who haven't blocked him.
I am pretty close to doing just that.
Steve's pro-establishment discourse and arbitrary disparagement of vaping advocates has become infamous on ECF. I doubt there are many people who haven't blocked him.
What are you trying to say steve?
Are you saying this study is not junk.
Are you saying we "here" think Dr Fs study of diacetyl is junk.
Or perhaps you are just spouting junk.
Someone recently said Dr. F is ANTZ because he said diketones should be avoided...
Someone recently said Dr. F is ANTZ because he said diketones should be avoided...
Please quote.
Someone recently said Dr. F is ANTZ because he said diketones should be avoided...
It was Steve who brought it upIt was in a thread with rolygate involved regarding the effects of diacetyls on vapers.
I believe racehorse was in there and seem to remember caramel throwing 2 cents in to the conversation also.
I was just lurking.
Maybe that will help you remember.
Regards,
Hazy![]()
It's junkscience. Practically anything from Glantz is junkscience.
It was in a thread with rolygate involved regarding the effects of diacetyls on vapers.
I believe racehorse was in there and seem to remember caramel throwing 2 cents in to the conversation also.
I was just lurking.
Maybe that will help you remember.
Regards,
Hazy![]()
so far we have found at least 2 flavoring ingredients which have highly probable health risks.
Hi Caramel. While I tried searching this digital jungle for a quote
I could not find one [...]
[...]
But Dr Konstantino didn't stop there.
He aimed at the effects of vaping as compared to not smoking or vaping.
His studies aren't over and are coming out piecemeal.
Here:
A new study verifies the lower risk-potential of e-cigarettes but identifies an avoidable risk
“The study is important because it confirms the lower risk potential of e-cigarettes compared to smoking but also identifies an avoidable risk”
said leading author Dr Konstantinos Farsalinos. He added: “We expect to see appropriate action taken by the e-cigarette industry to remove this small but unnecessary risk, making the products even safer than they currently are”.
That leaves much open as to what exactly should be done and who should make sure it is done.
Regards,
Hazy![]()
Someone recently said Dr. F is ANTZ because he said diketones should be avoided...
From the article: Ultimately, when asked flat-out about safety, the panel concluded that e-cigarettes are probably not as harmful as standard cigarettes. We know that the level of carcinogens and toxins are lower,says Thornburg..
I am concerned about the lack of information on the ingredients in our eliquids too. Even the sites who claim full ingredient disclousre just say natural and artifical flavorings.... That covers a lot of ground.
I do not want ejuice banned or anything but I do want to be able to be a fully informed consumer of it.
It will all settle out in time.
It was Steve who brought it up
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/f...anda-re-diacetyl-e-cigs-39.html#post15445144
Post #391
The topic was brought up by others in that thread, including roly.
See #383 by racehorse in same thread.
the reason both steve and racehorse brought it up is because
Dr F's study's conclusions regarding diacetyls in vape have been brought up
in this forum as well as elsewhere.
Hazy, can you clarify which topic are you talking about? Cause there are two topics there, one being diacetyl, and the other being Dr. F being ANTZ. While I agree that diacetyl has been brought up by multiple posters in multiple threads, the topic of Dr. F being ANTZ looks to me as being Steve's doing.