• This forum has been archived

    If you'd like to post a thread, post it here instead!

    View Forum

Vapor has it's own distinction now?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kagey K

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 17, 2013
692
336
Canada
After the flight that got aborted due to deicers and many calling it smoke, while all outlets called it vapor... Does this bring up a new validity to our vapor?

Flight of Cuba-bound Canadian plane aborted by white vapor - UPI.com

Seems to me like it should as they refused to call it smoke and repeatedly said vapor over and over, stating it was non harmful or deadly.

Edit: I believe if they wanted vapor banned they took a huge miss step here, as they invalidated many of the arguments against vaping.
 
Last edited:

Qcaj

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 8, 2012
192
118
Calgary
Hmm, unfortunately, it now sets a precedent for an emergency landing in the case of vapour.

edit: And, after a thought, I think I'm okay with this. If the "symptoms" of a leak into the power valve look/smell the same as somebody vaping, then it's definitely not okay to put the safety of passengers over my/vapers' personal comfort for a few hours.

Heck, I've flown about 8 times since I started vaping (2 of those long-hauls Van->Hong Kong) and have never vaped on a plane.
 
Last edited:

Ang-EC

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 25, 2013
117
82
East Coast Canada
The flight was delayed because the leaking fluid created a white, odorless haze inside the plane that frightened passengers.
That doesn't sound like a thumbs up for vaping to me. :)

No one wants to see a haze rising inside a plane. Smoking on planes has been banned for so long now most people don't even remember it so seeing "smoke" on a plane is no longer normal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread