Vapor production versus nicotine amt

Status
Not open for further replies.

JKBonin

Moved On
Jan 4, 2010
234
8
NH
Funny, I was just thinking the same thing. I'm waiting for a response from Rob @ altsmoke, and once I have a few questions answered, I'll be ordering a Silver Bullet from him. The SB produces loads of vapor :pso I'm wondering if the nic level I now use will be too much due to the much larger amts of vapor.

It does make sense to me. Any experts wanna chime in? I'm wicked curious about this! :confused:
 

JKBonin

Moved On
Jan 4, 2010
234
8
NH
Well at higher voltages you are vaporizing more liquid; therefore, you should be getting more nicotine. I do not chain vape my SB as much at higher voltages compared to vaping at lower voltages. Note: I love my SB--a great device.

Um.. from what I've read & watched, the SB produces much more vapor @ 3.7v too. The theory being the 18650 @ 2400mah maintains the charge for much much longer, therefore it's like the 1st few hits on a fresh 510 batt. Much slower batt discharge due to size, therefore more vapor more consistently.

This is correct? yes, no? And if yes, won't I be getting more nic even @ 3.7?

And FYI, I vape 36mg. Lowering my nic due to the awesome vapor from the SB would be a good thing indeed!
 

mwahle1

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 19, 2009
862
24
Chicago, IL. USA
Um.. from what I've read & watched, the SB produces much more vapor @ 3.7v too. The theory being the 18650 @ 2400mah maintains the charge for much much longer, therefore it's like the 1st few hits on a fresh 510 batt. Much slower batt discharge due to size, therefore more vapor more consistently.

This is correct? yes, no? And if yes, won't I be getting more nic even @ 3.7?

And FYI, I vape 36mg. Lowering my nic due to the awesome vapor from the SB would be a good thing indeed!

Theoretically, if you are vaporizing more liquid you should be getting more nicotine.

Also, in my opinion, the nicotine content is the largest factor that determines throat hit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread